Search results

Create the page "Needs review" on this wiki!

Page title matches

• A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review
  <h2> Objectives and Literature Review </h2>
  7 KB (1,162 words) - 07:22, 14 March 2012
• Review of probability concepts
  ==Probability review== This quick review of probability concepts is a work in progress.
  7 KB (1,214 words) - 21:12, 31 January 2019
• Complex Number Review
  3 KB (553 words) - 15:40, 12 August 2016

Page text matches

• DNA Melting Part 2: Lock-in Amplifier and Temperature Control
  ...a much higher frequency. So rip that sucker off &mdash; now your amplifier needs to work on a signal that is changing much more quickly. ...iki page]] to become familiar with the software. You may find it useful to review the block diagram again on the [[Understanding the lock-in amplifier]] wiki
  20 KB (3,227 words) - 20:05, 7 November 2017
• Lab Manual: Measuring DNA Melting Curves
  ...ntary olives. See the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|this wiki page]] for a review of the temperature-dependent equilibrium between single-stranded and double ...hermodynamics before (or if it has been a while since you have), see this review of [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics]] before you go on.
  10 KB (1,473 words) - 03:39, 13 April 2016
• Assignment 8, Part 2: lock-in amplifier and temperature control
  ...a much higher frequency. So rip that sucker off &mdash; now your amplifier needs to work on a signal that is changing much more quickly. ...iki page]] to become familiar with the software. You may find it useful to review the block diagram again on the [[Understanding the lock-in amplifier]] wiki
  17 KB (2,813 words) - 22:56, 7 November 2017
• Electronics primer
  ==Review of electrical units and equations== ...itle=Electronics_Primer#Primary_definitions Primary definitions] and also review [http://measure.mit.edu/~20.309/wiki/index.php?title=Electronics_Primer#Con
  22 KB (3,534 words) - 13:50, 19 October 2018
• 20.309:Course Information
  [[Category:Needs review]]
  5 KB (714 words) - 16:37, 7 February 2020
• Lab Manual: Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
  ...perational principles of a commercial AFM. You may also find it helpful to review some of the ''[[Lab Manual: Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)#References|refere To be useful for imaging, an AFM needs to scan its probe over the sample surface. Our microscopes are designed wit
  56 KB (9,320 words) - 20:42, 13 December 2017
• Resource list: Particle tracking
  ...Mason1997.pdf Particle Tracking Microrheology of Complex Fluids]. Physical Review Letters, Volume 79, Number 17, 27 October 1997.
  810 B (94 words) - 18:03, 13 August 2013
• Resource list: Electronics
  ==Electronics Review==
  459 B (49 words) - 14:32, 23 August 2013
• 20.345:Course Information
  ...e not previously studied geometric optics or those in need of a refresher. Review sessions on electronics and linear systems will also be offered. The value of a careful literature review cannot be understated. This frequently neglected step can make the differen
  11 KB (1,722 words) - 17:22, 6 February 2018
• Spring 2011:CellFinder
  *we have little electronics experience, and Jenn needs an electronics review :)
  4 KB (610 words) - 00:07, 3 April 2011
• Spring 11:SMR
  * review synthesizible and unsynthesizable commands
  3 KB (414 words) - 16:56, 15 April 2011
• Spring 11 ChemotaxisAssayWeeklyReports
  * Review particle tracking code
  690 B (93 words) - 02:09, 19 March 2011
• Spring 11 Chemotaxis Assay Weekly Reports
  * Review particle tracking code
  690 B (93 words) - 02:15, 19 March 2011
• DNA Melting: Simulating DNA Melting - Basics
  *Review the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|DNA Melting Thermodynamics Notes]]. *If you need a review of Matlab fundamentals, see [[Matlab:Matlab Fundamentals|Matlab Fundamental
  13 KB (2,026 words) - 22:46, 15 April 2018
• Confocal Wiki
  ... suggested experiments for approximately $20,000. Based on our literature review, such a system does not currently exist.
  21 KB (3,664 words) - 21:38, 4 June 2015
• Reference List
  Huang, B. a. (2009). Super resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annual review of biochemistry, 993-1016.
  2 KB (233 words) - 20:37, 19 May 2011
• Spring 2012 Bioinstrumentation Project Lab
  * [[A.Williams:_Objectives_and_Literature_Review| Objectives & Literature Review -- Ajoke Williams]]
  927 B (112 words) - 05:02, 18 May 2012
• Spring 2012: Ajoke Jumoke Williams
  [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]<br/>
  2 KB (310 words) - 03:23, 20 May 2012
• A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review
  <h2> Objectives and Literature Review </h2>
  7 KB (1,162 words) - 07:22, 14 March 2012
• Final Project Proposal Williams
  <h4> Literature Review </h4>
  10 KB (1,500 words) - 08:41, 14 March 2012
• Final Project: Spatial Light Modulator Galore
  #REDIRECT [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]
  58 B (7 words) - 14:39, 11 March 2012
• Spring 2012:LFM Documentation
  ...llows the consumer to refocus the image before capturing a light field, to review all past photos still on the camera, and to refocus after capturing the ima
  18 KB (2,796 words) - 05:15, 18 May 2012
• Nonlinear regression
  ==Review of linear regression==
  5 KB (774 words) - 18:07, 13 January 2014
• Electronics Mini-Lab
  This bootcamp requires an understanding of basic circuits. If you need to review circuit concepts, start with the [[Electronics Primer]] page. If you have a
  35 KB (5,891 words) - 18:46, 7 April 2017
• Geometrical Optics
  [[Category:Needs review]] ==Concept review==
  793 B (95 words) - 21:35, 4 June 2015
• Error analysis
  ...l. Fortunately, there always seems to be somebody with a bigger office who needs a couch. ==Review of probability and statists concepts==
  24 KB (3,757 words) - 14:57, 3 September 2018
• Optics Bootcamp
  For a good review of geometrical optics, ray tracing, and some worked-out ray tracing example
  28 KB (4,857 words) - 20:09, 31 July 2017
• Estimating second order system parameters from noise power spectra using nonlinear regression
  ==Regression concepts review==
  30 KB (4,815 words) - 21:47, 27 December 2015
• 20.109(S08):Transcript-level analysis (Day5)
  ... topic). Do your best to incorporate suggestions from the peer and faculty review.
  14 KB (2,255 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Initiate cell culture (Day2)
  ...l-biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  12 KB (2,006 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Preparing cells for analysis (Day4)
  ...ab partner. Begin by reading the [[Media:PeerReviewTips.pdf| tips for peer review]] from Neal Lerner. Then, as you read your lab partner's writing, be a thou ...uggestions for improvement whenever possible. Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner.
  16 KB (2,751 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Wrap-up analysis (Day7)
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  7 KB (1,208 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):DNA engineering/DNA engineering by PCR (Day 1)
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
  27 KB (3,752 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):DNA engineering/Clean and cut DNA (Day 2)
  ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be
  10 KB (1,692 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):DNA engineering/Restriction map and tissue culture (Day 6)
  ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
  11 KB (1,738 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Site-directed mutagenesis (Day2)
  ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
  12 KB (1,954 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Student presentations (M2D8)
  ====Review Articles (for reference only)==== ====Review Articles (for reference only)====
  9 KB (1,472 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  22 KB (3,631 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (761 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Guidelines for writing a lab report
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
  12 KB (1,912 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S08):Data analysis (Day7)
  ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
  14 KB (2,336 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Yeast transformation
  ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
  19 KB (3,251 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  22 KB (3,724 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  4 KB (732 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07):Guidelines for writing a lab report
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
  12 KB (1,849 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
• Bryan Hernandez/20.109/Lab notebook/Module 2/Day 2
  ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>
  19 KB (3,069 words) - 15:48, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Colony PCR
  ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on
  9 KB (1,466 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Growth of phage materials
  ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  4 KB (600 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07):Bio-material engineering/Screening library
  ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  9 KB (1,473 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
• Bryan Hernandez/20.109/Lab notebook/Module 1/Day 2
  #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over
  17 KB (2,960 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Agarose gel electrophoresis
  #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over
  15 KB (2,609 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Start-up signal measurement
  #Review your understanding of protein structure visualization by examining another
  21 KB (3,477 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Measuring calcium in vitro
  ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>
  20 KB (3,237 words) - 15:45, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Lipofection
  # Review the descriptions of the lab's microscopes that we covered during [http://op
  9 KB (1,436 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Measuring calcium in vivo
  ...]]. You will be presenting one of these articles to the class, so begin to review both the [[20.109(S07):Guidelines for oral presentations| guidelines for or
  7 KB (1,103 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(S07): Bio-material engineering/Optimizing panning
  #To better understand how the library of plasmids was synthesized, please review the chemistry involved in joining nucleotides during DNA replication. Draw
  10 KB (1,637 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(F07):Guidelines for writing a lab report
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
  12 KB (1,850 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(F07):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  22 KB (3,670 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(F07): M13.1
  ...: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Help:Ribosome_Binding_Site this review site] which includes some useful characterization information. <font color ... the point of the sentence hard to get"</i>). Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner. Keep your fingers crossed tha
  19 KB (3,059 words) - 16:00, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(F07):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  4 KB (733 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(F07): Genome engineering assessment
  ...ext time| a homework assignment], exchanged with your lab partner for peer review, then submitted to the teaching faculty as part of your portfolio. <b>This
  15 KB (2,532 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(F07): Module 2 oral presentations
  ...s=4&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum review's abstract and pubmed link]
  11 KB (1,596 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(F07): Growth of phage materials
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. Phage that can bind to cobalt oxide, gold, iridium and indium tin oxide ar ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  10 KB (1,707 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
• 20.109(F08):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  26 KB (4,345 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Mod 3 Day 7 Oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  12 KB (1,972 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Yeast transformation
  ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
  19 KB (3,254 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08):DNA engineering/Clean and cut DNA (Day 2)
  ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be
  10 KB (1,692 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Colony PCR
  ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on
  9 KB (1,467 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Screen for phenotypes, isolate RNA
  Many phenotypes have been described for <i> S. cerevisiae</i>. A very fine review of these was published by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db ...dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9301019&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Hampsey review] to familiarize yourself with the range of phenotypes that are detectable a
  21 KB (3,401 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): old announcements
  ...ue to the religious holiday and would like to meet on Friday (10.10.08) to review the material we covered, please just email me and we can set up a time. [[U
  3 KB (565 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Mod 3 Day 1 Growth of phage materials
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  16 KB (2,756 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08):DNA engineering/DNA engineering by PCR (Day 1)
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
  23 KB (3,892 words) - 19:30, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08):DNA engineering/Restriction map and tissue culture (Day 6)
  ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
  11 KB (1,738 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Growth of phage materials
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. Phage that can bind to cobalt oxide, gold, iridium and indium tin oxide ar ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  10 KB (1,707 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Mod 2 Day 4 SDS-PAGE, screen for phenotypes
  Many phenotypes have been described for <i> S. cerevisiae</i>. A very fine review of these was published by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db ...dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9301019&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Hampsey review] to familiarize yourself with the range of phenotypes that are detectable a
  25 KB (4,068 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Mod 1 Day 1 DNA engineering using PCR
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
  22 KB (3,807 words) - 19:29, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Mod 1 Day 6 Restriction map and tissue culture
  ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
  11 KB (1,701 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Mod 1 Day 7 Lipofection
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http
  10 KB (1,701 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Mod 2 Day 2 Yeast transformation
  ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
  18 KB (3,152 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08): Mod 2 Day 3 Colony PCR and journal article discussion
  ...csum Wu et al, published in Mol Cell in 2004]. There is also an associated review article [http://openwetware.org/wiki/PMID:_15653319 ] that was written to c
  9 KB (1,612 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
  12 KB (1,922 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F08):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (761 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S09):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (788 words) - 19:34, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S09):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
  13 KB (2,033 words) - 19:34, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 5 Assessing re-tuned system
  ...light and dark to assess the β-gal activity associated with your mutants. Review the [[20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] tha
  17 KB (2,716 words) - 19:39, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S09):Site-directed mutagenesis (Day2)
  ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
  13 KB (2,155 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S09):Data analysis (Day8)
  ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
  14 KB (2,303 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S09): siRNA design (Day1)
  ...ssion next time. You will have 45 minutes of in-class time to complete and review your reading. As before, each pair of students will present one figure or s
  22 KB (3,613 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S09):Wrap-up analysis (Day7)
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  5 KB (904 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Fall 2009 schedule
  | Neal/Linda visit lab for peer review exercise<br> [[Media:20.109(F09) M1D6lab.pptx| NK lab notes]], [[Media:F09_
  9 KB (1,307 words) - 19:42, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 1 Day 1 DNA engineering using PCR
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
  22 KB (3,783 words) - 19:44, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 3 Day 4 Battery assembly
  ...should be well on your way to your final presentations of a research idea. Review the required elements for your presentation that are noted [http://openwetw
  5 KB (921 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 1 Day 4 DNA ligations and bacterial transformations
  ...t 2 copies of this draft for next time. We will use them in lab for a peer review exercise. * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o
  10 KB (1,761 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 1 Day 5 Examine candidate clones
  ...are too harsh or too obscure to be integrated into a revision. During your review, find at least one good example in the background/aims/results/plans/figure
  11 KB (1,830 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 1 Day 6 Restriction map and tissue culture
  ...l will be photographed. While the gel is running, we will engage in a peer review session around the preliminary results sections that you've all written as
  11 KB (1,830 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 1 Day 7 Lipofection
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http
  10 KB (1,594 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09):DNA engineering "Progress Report"
  * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o ... be used to detect homologous recombination in mammalian cells. The reader needs to know what the goal is: which plasmid did you set out to create? Part B o
  7 KB (1,083 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (777 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
  13 KB (1,951 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 3 Day 6 Oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  5 KB (879 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  27 KB (4,508 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 6 Readouts of DNA, Protein
  Review [[20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 1 Testing an engineered biological system| protoco
  13 KB (2,115 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F09): Mod 3 Day 1 Growth of phage materials
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  16 KB (2,666 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S10):Wrap-up analysis (Day7)
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  5 KB (919 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10): Mod 2 Day 7 Readout of Protein
  ...ummary statement will be due at the end of the next module so you can also review the requirements for this assignment [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109(F1
  10 KB (1,613 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10):DNA engineering "Progress Report"
  * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o ... be used to detect homologous recombination in mammalian cells. The reader needs to know what the goal is: which plasmid did you set out to create? Part B o
  7 KB (1,131 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  27 KB (4,538 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  18 KB (2,793 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (815 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10): Fall 2010 schedule
  ...10) M1D6 labtalk.pdf| M1D6 lab lecture]]<br> Neal/Linda visit lab for peer review exercise<br>
  8 KB (1,189 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10): Mod 1 Day 1 DNA engineering using PCR
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
  22 KB (3,783 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10): Mod 3 Day 6 Oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  5 KB (880 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10): Mod 1 Day 4 DNA ligations and bacterial transformations
  ...t 2 copies of this draft for next time. We will use them in lab for a peer review exercise. * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o
  11 KB (1,791 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10): Mod 1 Day 5 Examine candidate clones
  ...are too harsh or too obscure to be integrated into a revision. During your review, find at least one good example in the background/aims/results/plans/figure
  11 KB (1,830 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S11):RNA to DNA by RT-PCR (Day5)
  ...lve patient intake of heme to inhibit the defective synthetic pathway (see review [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19479318 at this link]).
  8 KB (1,243 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S11):Prepare DNA for cloning (Day3)
  ...s include those that regulate chemotaxis, osmoregulation, and virulence. A review of 2CS from the perspective of appropriate signal transduction &mdash; e.g.
  17 KB (2,967 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F10): Fall 2011 schedule
  | ? peer review exercise, or maybe lab practical on part 1<br>
  5 KB (682 words) - 21:07, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F11): Mod 1 Day 1 DNA engineering using PCR
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
  22 KB (3,809 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F11):DNA engineering powerpoint summary
  *a review of the science on which the recombination assay is based
  3 KB (528 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F11): Mod 3 Day 6 Oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  5 KB (879 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F11): Mod 1 Day 6 Lipofection & lab practical
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http ...ering Module is due in just over a week. It is strongly suggested that you review the feedback you've gotten on the figures you've prepared so far and improv
  10 KB (1,541 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F11): System engineering research article
  *Begin this section with a 3 sentence review/overview. *a three sentence overview/review to begin this section
  7 KB (1,159 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F11): Mod 3 Day 4 Solar cell assembly
  ...should be well on your way to your final presentations of a research idea. Review the required elements for your presentation that are noted [http://openwetw
  5 KB (811 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F11): Mod 2 Day 6 Readouts of DNA, Protein
  Review the [[20.109(F11): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] pre
  16 KB (2,610 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F11): Mod 2 Day 7 Readout of Protein
  ...ummary statement will be due at the end of the next module so you can also review the requirements for this assignment [[20.109(F11):Blogging and summary tho
  10 KB (1,644 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Mod 3 Day 1 Growth of phage materials
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  18 KB (3,015 words) - 13:43, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Mod 3 Day 6 Oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  2 KB (345 words) - 13:43, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Mod 3 Day 5 Solar cell testing
  #The anode needs to be coated in a layer of Surlyn (a trademarked resin from Dupont. This e ...t 300 words by midnight M3D5. Your summary statement is also almost due so review the requirements for this assignment [[20.109(F12): Reflections| here]] and
  5 KB (883 words) - 13:43, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Site-directed mutagenesis (Day2)
  ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
  13 KB (2,152 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Testing cell viability (Day3)
  ...l/biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  15 KB (2,447 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Induce protein and evaluate DNA (Day5)
  ...equencing pros after your Module 1 experience, of course, but feel free to review the relevant background [[20.109%28S13%29:DNA_sequencing_and_primer_analysi
  15 KB (2,584 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13): Protein engineering report
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
  5 KB (674 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  27 KB (4,582 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Assess protein function (Day8)
  ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
  16 KB (2,718 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Protein-level and wrap-up analysis (Day7)
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  6 KB (932 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13): DNA engineering report
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
  8 KB (1,267 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (895 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Module 3 oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  6 KB (923 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  22 KB (3,317 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Preparing cells for analysis (Day4)
  ...l/biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f ***RLT needs to have &beta;mercaptoethanol added before use (just an aliquot, stable for
  24 KB (4,100 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  22 KB (3,344 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Module 3 oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th ..., and (2) some further elaboration/detail/citations for the instructors to review.
  14 KB (2,342 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Mod 1 Day 6 Lipofection and CometChip Analysis
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20. ... induced. Think back to Agi's lecture on statistical analysis &ndash; what needs to be done to answer that question? You may find [[Media: S09_20109_M2D5-St
  14 KB (2,345 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): DNA engineering summary
  '''''You will complete this assignment individually.''''' Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F14):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(F14): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
  9 KB (1,410 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Mod 1 Day 1 DNA engineering using PCR
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F14):Module
  23 KB (3,882 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Mod 1 Day 5 Examine candidate clones & tissue culture
  *Review the [[20.109(F14):Guidelines for working in the tissue culture facility| ti
  20 KB (3,455 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Mod 1 Day 6 Lipofection and paper discussion
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20.
  11 KB (1,850 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  29 KB (4,864 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Mod 2 Day 6 Readouts of DNA, Protein
  Review the [[20.109(F14): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] pre
  15 KB (2,449 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Mod 3 Day 1 Growth of phage materials
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  16 KB (2,583 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Mod 3 Day 2 Phage nanowires
  ...sted in more information about biotemplating, you may want to consult this review article: [http://cdn-pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cm702152a?journalCode=cm
  13 KB (2,165 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): DNA engineering methods
  You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F14):Statement on collaboration and integrity | stateme Please review the scientific writing guidelines related to methods [[20.109%28F14%29:Guid
  3 KB (408 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  22 KB (3,322 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (895 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Slides for Journal Club Presentation
  #'''review the instructions''' for giving an oral presentation, even if you will not b # '''review Atissa's instructions''' about constructing slides and draft the slides you
  3 KB (513 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14):Module 3 oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  14 KB (2,324 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): System engineering report
  *Begin this section with a 3 sentence review/overview. *a three sentence overview/review to begin this section
  7 KB (1,144 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): System engineering research article
  *Begin this section with a 3 sentence review/overview. *a three sentence overview/review to begin this section
  8 KB (1,258 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Journal Club Presentations
  #'''review the guidelines''' for giving an oral presentation that are [[20.109(F14):Gu
  2 KB (409 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F14): Mod 1 Day 6 Lipofection
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20.
  14 KB (2,341 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15): Mod 3 Day 1 Growth of phage materials
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  16 KB (2,583 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15): Mod 3 Day 1 Growth of phage materials (Day 1)
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  16 KB (2,577 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):16S PCR and paper discussion (Day3)
  ...to via one gene (usually 16S rRNA) alone. You can learn more in the linked review papers [http://www.microbialinformaticsj.com/content/pdf/2042-5783-2-3.pdf
  22 KB (3,588 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):AIV detection assay and analysis (Day7)
  ...ngs for the AIV screening portion of this module as a Primer Design Memo. Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28S15%29:Primer_design_memo guideli
  24 KB (3,931 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Biotemplating on phage nanowires (Day 2)
  ...sted in more information about biotemplating, you may want to consult this review article: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm702152a] Sotiropoulou, Sofia, et al.
  14 KB (2,281 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Cell preparation for DNA repair assays (Day4)
  ===Part 2: Peer Review of Methods Homework=== ...ific comments to your fellow 109er about what they have done well and what needs further work. Complete this activity using the "golden rule" -- offer the t
  18 KB (2,885 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Diagnostic primer analysis (Day8)
  ...ngs for the AIV screening portion of this module as a Primer Design Memo. Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28S15%29:Primer_design_memo guideli
  6 KB (992 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Diagnostic primer design (Day2)
  #*Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28S15%29:Guidelines_for_oral_presen
  13 KB (2,073 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Flow cytometry and paper discussion (Day6)
  ...sh; a process that shouldn’t be rushed. To help get you started, let’s review a few key elements of DNA repair and of the NHEJ pathway in particular. ...e schematic below from the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24680220 '''review by Grundy et al.'''] highlights that many accessory molecules have their ow
  15 KB (2,568 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Growth of phage nanowires (Day 1)
  ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  16 KB (2,579 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (894 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  21 KB (3,275 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Journal club I (Day6)
  #*Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28S15%29:Guidelines_for_writing_up_
  2 KB (235 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  25 KB (4,176 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Microbial DNA extraction (Day1)
  ...is described in the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15489351 '''linked review'''] by Dr. Jill Clarridge.
  15 KB (2,507 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Microbiome data summary
  You will complete this assignment as individuals. Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S15):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | '''stat Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109%28S15%29:_Assignments#Overview | ('''link'''
  14 KB (2,270 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):NHEJ system research article
  You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(S15):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | '''stat ...rch#Introduction | '''funnel structure for the introduction''']], and also review the [[20.109%28S15%29:Cell_preparation_for_DNA_repair_assays_%28Day4%29#Hom
  7 KB (1,103 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S15):Research proposal presentation
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  14 KB (2,323 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):RNA to DNA by RT-PCR (Day5)
  ...lve patient intake of heme to inhibit the defective synthetic pathway (see review [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19479318 at this link]).
  8 KB (1,365 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  27 KB (4,554 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Site-directed mutagenesis (Day2)
  ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
  13 KB (2,109 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Induce protein and evaluate DNA (Day5)
  ...ion (through today's experiments) to be included in your research article. Review the [[20.109%28S12%29:_Protein_engineering_report | report-specific guideli
  17 KB (2,911 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Assess protein function (Day7)
  ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
  23 KB (3,809 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (893 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12): RNA engineering report
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S12):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
  5 KB (796 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12): Protein engineering report
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S12):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
  5 KB (776 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Module 3 oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  5 KB (905 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Initiate cell culture (Day2)
  ...l/biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  10 KB (1,708 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Protein-level and wrap-up analysis (Day7)
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  6 KB (929 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S12):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  21 KB (3,191 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13):Module 3 oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  14 KB (2,304 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  28 KB (4,787 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13): Mod 1 Day 1 DNA engineering using PCR
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F13):Module
  21 KB (3,687 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13): Mod 2 Day 1 System Design
  ...11am on the day of your next lab class. Submit this assignment to Stellar. Review the submission guidelines [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28F13%29:_DNA
  26 KB (4,292 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13): Mod 1 Day 5 Examine candidate clones & tissue culture
  #Review the [[20.109(F13):Guidelines for working in the tissue culture facility| ti
  17 KB (2,866 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13): Mod 1 Day 6 Lipofection and paper discussion
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20. #*Feel free to review [[20.109%28F13%29:_DNA_engineering_summary#Logistics | Logistics -- ''Guide
  12 KB (1,875 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (895 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13): System engineering report
  You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
  10 KB (1,586 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13): Mod 3 Day 2 Phage nanowires
  ...sted in more information about biotemplating, you may want to consult this review article: [http://cdn-pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cm702152a?journalCode=cm ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  15 KB (2,422 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  22 KB (3,319 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13): DNA engineering methods
  You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Please review the scientific writing guidelines related to methods [[20.109%28F13%29:Guid
  3 KB (433 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F13): DNA engineering summary
  You will complete this assignment in pairs. Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109%28F13%29:_Assignments#Overview | ('''link'''
  10 KB (1,548 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S10):RNA to DNA by RT-PCR (Day5)
  ...lve patient intake of heme to inhibit the defective synthetic pathway (see review [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19479318 at this link]).
  7 KB (1,218 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S10):Site-directed mutagenesis (Day2)
  ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
  13 KB (2,131 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S10):Lab tour
  # Review today’s lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  26 KB (4,410 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S10):Data analysis (Day8)
  ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
  15 KB (2,419 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S10):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (788 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S10):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
  20 KB (3,083 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S10):Initiate cell culture (Day2)
  ...l-biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  12 KB (1,957 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S11):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  5 KB (826 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S11):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  20 KB (3,142 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S11):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  26 KB (4,424 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S11):Module 3 oral presentations
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  5 KB (867 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(S11): RNA engineering report
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S11):Statement_on_Collaboration_and_Integrity | stateme
  6 KB (1,012 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): System engineering research article
  *Begin this section with a short review/overview. *a short sentence overview/review to begin this section
  6 KB (919 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  6 KB (925 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Oral presentation of research proposal
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
  2 KB (345 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Slides for Journal Club Presentation
  #'''review the instructions''' for giving an oral presentation, even if you will not b # '''review Atissa's instructions''' about constructing slides and draft the slides you
  3 KB (512 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  19 KB (3,038 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Mod 1 Day 1 DNA engineering using PCR
  ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F12):Module
  22 KB (3,714 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab certification that you will take next
  27 KB (4,585 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): M1 ppt summary and notes
  *a review of the science on which the recombination assay is based
  6 KB (922 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Lab certifications
  ...along. Nevertheless if you want to "get ready" for the lab certifications, review your lab notes and notebooks. Use the wiki to clarify what seems cryptic. Y
  2 KB (345 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Results and Discussion sections
  *Begin this section with a short review/overview. *a short sentence overview/review to begin this section
  3 KB (482 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Mod 1 Day 6 Lipofection & lab practical
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20. ...ividually at your benches, using your notebooks as resources. You can also review the virtual labwork with the TA during this time.
  9 KB (1,495 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Mod 3 Day 4 Solar cell assembly
  ...osals. These will be presented/turned in just one week from today! You can review the requirements for the final proposals [[20.109(F12): Oral presentation o
  5 KB (769 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(F12): Mod 2 Day 6 Readouts of DNA, Protein
  Review the [[20.109(F12): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] pre
  15 KB (2,536 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):Context-setting and primer design (Day1)
  ...oridian genome in [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15590811 this linked review] by Keeling and Slamovits, or about microsporidia in general at this ''PLOS ... for probing phenotype (as described for microsporidia specifically in the review by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130667/ Garcia]. Recently,
  21 KB (3,355 words) - 13:47, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S13):PCR and paper discussion (Day3)
  ...to via one gene (usually 16S rRNA) alone. You can learn more in the linked review papers [http://www.microbialinformaticsj.com/content/pdf/2042-5783-2-3.pdf
  17 KB (2,771 words) - 13:47, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Microbial DNA extraction (Day1)
  ...is described in the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15489351 '''linked review'''] by Dr. Jill Clarridge.
  16 KB (2,542 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Diagnostic primer design (Day2)
  ...oridian genome in [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15590811 this linked review] by Keeling and Slamovits, or about microsporidia in general at this ''PLOS ... for probing phenotype, as described for microsporidia specifically in the review by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130667/ Garcia]. Recently,
  19 KB (3,074 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):16S PCR and paper discussion (Day3)
  ...to via one gene (usually 16S rRNA) alone. You can learn more in the linked review papers [http://www.microbialinformaticsj.com/content/pdf/2042-5783-2-3.pdf
  19 KB (3,108 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Microbiome summary
  You will complete this assignment in pairs. Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S14):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | '''stat Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109%28S14%29:_Assignments#Overview | ('''link'''
  14 KB (2,322 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Protein-level and wrap-up analysis (Day7)
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th ..., and (2) some further elaboration/detail/citations for the instructors to review.
  6 KB (1,026 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main messages
  6 KB (917 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Lab tour
  # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
  28 KB (4,689 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Begin Western protein analysis (Day2)
  ...ill store these samples for you at -80 &deg;C in case another Western blot needs to be completed. ...ung cancer. You do NOT need to make a figure this time, but you DO need to review the guiding questions in the Day 3 protocol and be ready to participate in
  16 KB (2,680 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Data analysis (Day7)
  ...sh; a process that shouldn’t be rushed. To help get you started, let’s review a few key elements of DNA repair and of the NHEJ pathway in particular. ...e schematic below from the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24680220 '''review by Grundy et al.'''] highlights that many accessory molecules have their ow
  16 KB (2,686 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):Testing cell viability (Day3)
  ...l/biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
  15 KB (2,507 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
• 20.109(S14):NHEJ system research article
  You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(S14):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | '''stat ...rch#Introduction | '''funnel structure for the introduction''']], and also review the [[20.109%28S14%29:DNA_repair_assays%28Day6%29#For_next_time | '''specif
  7 KB (1,028 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
• 20.309 Main Page
  * [[Complex Number Review|Complex number review]] * [[Complex Number Review|Complex number review]]
  8 KB (887 words) - 20:47, 16 October 2020
• Review of probability concepts
  ==Probability review== This quick review of probability concepts is a work in progress.
  7 KB (1,214 words) - 21:12, 31 January 2019
• 20.109(F15):Evaluate mutations and site-directed mutagenesis (Day1)
  ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
  28 KB (4,525 words) - 14:45, 12 November 2015
• 20.109(F15):Site-directed mutagenesis (Day2)
  ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
  14 KB (2,182 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
• 20.109(F15): DNA engineering methods
  You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F15):Statement on collaboration and integrity | stateme Please review the scientific writing guidelines related to methods [[20.109%28F15%29:Guid
  3 KB (408 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
• 20.109(F15):Assess protein function (Day7)
  ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
  15 KB (2,549 words) - 00:24, 3 November 2015
• 20.109(F15):DNA engineering using PCR (Day1)
  ...r basic information on homologous recombination, please read the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F15):Module
  21 KB (3,638 words) - 13:47, 2 October 2015
• 20.109(F15):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  21 KB (3,266 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
• 20.109(F15):Lipofection (Day6)
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20.
  16 KB (2,572 words) - 17:58, 1 October 2015
• 20.109(F15):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main “messages”
  5 KB (896 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
• 20.109(F15): Protein engineering report
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F15):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
  8 KB (1,190 words) - 18:12, 9 November 2015
• 20.109(F15): DNA engineering summary
  '''''You will complete this assignment with your partner.''''' Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F15):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(F15): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
  10 KB (1,486 words) - 16:41, 7 October 2015
• 20.109(F15):Homework
  # Review the [[20.109(F15):Lab tour| lab orientation exercises]] to prepare for the #*Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28F15%29:Guidelines_for_writing_up_
  28 KB (4,514 words) - 20:04, 2 December 2015
• 20.109(F15):Research proposal presentation
  <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  14 KB (2,363 words) - 18:50, 30 November 2015
• 20.109(F15):Battery assembly (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise===
  7 KB (1,140 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
• 20.109(F15):Battery testing (Day4)
  ===Part 2: Peer review exercise===
  3 KB (470 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
• 20.109(F15): DNA engineering presentation
  Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(F15): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
  5 KB (708 words) - 13:23, 17 October 2015
• 20.109(F15):Cathode construction (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  10 KB (1,568 words) - 21:55, 18 November 2015
• 20.109(F15):Battery assembly and testing (Day5)
  #Review the template sheet of the Excel file.
  9 KB (1,418 words) - 18:31, 2 December 2015
• 20.109(S16):Guidelines for oral presentations
  *Review each of your main “messages”
  5 KB (896 words) - 16:07, 9 December 2015
• 20.109(S16): Protein engineering summary
  '''''You will complete this assignment with your partner.''''' Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S16):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(S16): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
  9 KB (1,392 words) - 20:18, 29 February 2016
• 20.109(S16):Guidelines for writing up your research
  ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
  21 KB (3,265 words) - 15:35, 7 April 2016
• 20.109(S16): Protein engineering presentation
  Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(S16): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
  4 KB (661 words) - 19:42, 15 February 2016
• 20.109(S16): System engineering report
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S16):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
  11 KB (1,619 words) - 16:17, 14 April 2016
• 20.109(S16):Research proposal presentation
  * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w ...rts in an area that interests you. More fun and interactive than reading a review paper for honing in on research gaps! But don't expect them to do all the w
  12 KB (1,985 words) - 17:47, 25 April 2016
• 20.109(S16):Cathode construction (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  9 KB (1,567 words) - 22:07, 10 December 2015
• 20.109(S16):Battery assembly and testing (Day5)
  #Review the template sheet of the Excel file.
  8 KB (1,384 words) - 17:28, 5 May 2016
• 20.109(S16):Introduction to cell strains and plating (Day1)
  #*Review Fig. 3. In the results section, the authors state that the "SF2 values cal #*Review Fig. 4 and 5. What do these data suggest concerning the role of DNA-PK in
  16 KB (2,780 words) - 17:34, 19 September 2016
• 20.109(S16):Begin Western blot protein analysis and choose system conditions (Day2)
  ...te!''' We will store these samples at -80 &deg;C in case your Western blot needs to be repeated. #*'''Hint:''' Review the M2D3 page and consider the size of the nonsense insert fragment.
  21 KB (3,393 words) - 15:00, 11 March 2016
• 20.109(S16):Cell preparation for DNA repair assays (Day5)
  Review the following inhibitors, then sign up on the [http://engineerbiology.org/w ...er well in a 24-well dish ~48 h in advance of today's laboratory session. Review the plating schematic for your experiment that is shown below and be sure t
  16 KB (2,542 words) - 18:34, 28 March 2016
• 20.109(S16):Flow cytometry and paper discussion (Day7)
  ...epair pathways of tumor cells. The [[Media:M2D7 DNA repair addiction.pdf |review article]] by Shaheen ''et al.'' provides further information on repair path
  11 KB (1,862 words) - 13:19, 4 April 2016
• 20.109(S16):Data analysis (Day9)
  ...NA-PK (and may be helpful as you write your research article). As a brief review, Ku80, with its dimer partner Ku70, completes the first step of NHEJ repair
  7 KB (1,170 words) - 16:31, 11 April 2016
• 20.109(S16):Design mutation primers (Day2)
  ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
  23 KB (3,783 words) - 20:41, 9 February 2016
• 20.109(S16):Homework
  # Review the [[20.109(S16):Lab tour| lab orientation exercises]] to prepare for the #*Review the assignment description for the [[20.109(S16): Protein engineering summa
  25 KB (3,974 words) - 17:41, 5 May 2016
• 20.109(S16):Assess protein function (Day8)
  ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
  15 KB (2,565 words) - 20:14, 2 March 2016
• 20.109(F16):DNA engineering using PCR (Day1)
  ...r basic information on homologous recombination, please read the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F16):Module
  21 KB (3,638 words) - 14:58, 18 May 2016
• 20.109(F16):Lab tour
  Review the following resources before you complete the tasks in Sections #8 and 9:
  27 KB (4,439 words) - 21:13, 9 September 2016
• 20.109(F16):Lipofection (Day6)
  ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20.
  16 KB (2,572 words) - 15:33, 18 May 2016
• 20.109(F16):Cathode construction (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  9 KB (1,567 words) - 15:50, 18 May 2016
• 20.109(F16):Battery assembly and testing (Day5)
  #Review the template sheet of the Excel file.
  8 KB (1,380 words) - 19:32, 5 December 2016
• 20.109(F16): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109%28F16%29:Lab_tour#Statem ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  8 KB (1,143 words) - 15:04, 1 November 2016
• 20.109(F16): DNA engineering summary
  '''''You will complete this assignment with your partner.''''' Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F16):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(F16): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
  10 KB (1,487 words) - 14:19, 9 June 2016
• 20.109(F16): DNA engineering presentation
  Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(F16): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
  4 KB (586 words) - 14:21, 9 June 2016
• 20.109(F16):Research proposal presentation
  *review/preview structure of talk * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  15 KB (2,372 words) - 15:22, 17 November 2016
• 20.109(F16):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(F16):Lab tour| lab orientation exercises]] to prepare for the #*Review the information provided by the BE Communication Lab workshop on M1D2.
  21 KB (3,289 words) - 21:26, 30 November 2016
• 20.109(F16):Communication
  *Review each of your main messages. ...the way a journal's editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting or not relevant.
  30 KB (4,506 words) - 22:00, 30 November 2016
• 20.109(F16):Seed cells for immuno-flourescence assay (Day5)
  #Review the generated images.
  12 KB (2,013 words) - 20:08, 30 September 2016
• 20.109(F16):Complete immuno-fluorescence assay (Day6)
  Review these [[Media: CometAssay_M1D6stats_F14.xlsx | data]] from an experiment wh
  9 KB (1,404 words) - 12:00, 5 October 2016
• Impedance Analysis
  ... time varying signal <math>Ae^{j \omega t}.</math> (Click [[Complex Number Review|here]] for a refresher on complex numbers.)
  5 KB (831 words) - 21:49, 17 August 2017
• 20.109(F16):Design gRNA for CRISPRi (Day2)
  With your laboratory partner, review [[Media:MetEngEcoli review.pdf |Metabolic engineering of ''Escherichia coli'' for production of mixed-
  13 KB (2,092 words) - 15:25, 6 October 2016
• Bode plots
  ...r on how to find the magnitude of a complex number, click [[Complex Number Review|here]]) ...tor) - \ang (denominator)</math> (click [[Complex Number Review|here]] for review of complex numbers)
  16 KB (2,729 words) - 20:05, 31 July 2017
• 20.109(F16):Journal club II (Day 6)
  '''You will complete this assignment individually.''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F16):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your talk be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F16):Communication#Oral_communi
  10 KB (1,515 words) - 16:52, 2 November 2016
• 20.109(F16):Measure DNA damage with comet chip (Day3)
  ... description of the BER pathway, read [[Media:Fa16 M1 BER review.pdf| this review]] by Robertson ''et al.''
  11 KB (1,892 words) - 19:35, 26 September 2016
• 20.109(F16): M1 Mini-presentation
  *'''''You will complete this assignment individually.''''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F16):Lab_tour#Statement_ *Be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F16):_Assignments class late po
  4 KB (647 words) - 18:57, 7 September 2016
• 20.109(F16): M1 Data Summary
  *'''You will complete this assignment with your partner.''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F16):Lab_tour#Statement_ *Be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F16):_Assignments class late po
  10 KB (1,449 words) - 12:08, 29 September 2016
• 20.109(F16): Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F16):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme *'''You will complete this assignment individually.''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F16):Lab_tour#Statement_
  8 KB (1,243 words) - 16:42, 4 November 2016
• 20.109(S17): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109%28S17%29:Lab_tour#Statem ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  8 KB (1,139 words) - 19:22, 10 February 2017
• 20.109(S17):Lab tour
  Review the following resources before you complete the tasks in Sections #8:
  24 KB (3,951 words) - 21:35, 31 January 2017
• 20.109(S17):Journal Club II (Day8)
  '''You will complete this assignment individually.''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S17):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your talk be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S17):Communication#Oral_communi
  12 KB (1,818 words) - 20:50, 6 April 2017
• 20.109(S17):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(S17):Lab tour| Laboratory Orientation exercises]] to prepare f #*Review the information provided by the BE Communication Lab workshop on M1D3.
  22 KB (3,470 words) - 18:41, 3 May 2018
• 20.109(S17):Communication
  *Review each of your main messages. ...the way a journal's editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting or not relevant.
  30 KB (4,508 words) - 17:29, 28 April 2017
• 20.109(S17):Cathode construction (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  10 KB (1,573 words) - 22:17, 31 January 2017
• 20.109(S17):Battery assembly and testing (Day5)
  #Review the template sheet of the Excel file.
  8 KB (1,391 words) - 14:18, 9 May 2017
• 20.109(S17):Research proposal presentation
  *review/preview structure of talk * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  15 KB (2,372 words) - 19:40, 28 December 2016
• 20.109(S17): M1 Data Summary
  *'''You will complete this assignment with your partner.''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S17):Lab_tour#Statement_ *Be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S17):_Assignments class late po
  8 KB (1,202 words) - 15:32, 7 February 2017
• 20.109(S17): M1 Mini-presentation
  *'''''You will complete this assignment individually.''''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S17):Lab_tour#Statement_ *Be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S17):_Assignments class late po
  4 KB (628 words) - 01:27, 31 January 2017
• 20.109(S17): Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S17):Lab_tour#Statement_ *Be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S17):_Assignments class late po
  8 KB (1,242 words) - 00:09, 4 April 2017
• 20.109(S17):Scan slides to identify FKBP12 binders (Day5)
  ===Part 3: Review journal article===
  5 KB (810 words) - 19:49, 27 February 2017
• 20.109(S17):Confirm cell lines and practice tissue culture techniques (Day1)
  As you prepare to work in the tissue culture room, review the following resource: ...te!''' We will store these samples at -80 &deg;C in case your Western blot needs to be repeated.
  20 KB (3,359 words) - 21:06, 9 March 2017
• 20.109(S17):Examine quantitative PCR results (Day9)
  ...ill use are confidence intervals (CI) and the Student's t-test. To begin, review the following definitions: Review [[Media: CometAssay_M1D6stats_F14.xlsx | '''these data''']] from an experim
  7 KB (1,142 words) - 15:44, 12 April 2017
• 20.109(S17):Complete cell survival assay and examine transcript levels in response to DNA damage (Day 4)
  #*Review the list of the search results, and select one that is appropriate for our #Review the information provided on the page.
  13 KB (2,158 words) - 17:55, 22 March 2017
• 20.109(F17):Lab tour
  Review the following resources before you complete the tasks in Sections #8:
  24 KB (3,974 words) - 13:25, 14 September 2017
• 20.109(F17): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109%28F17%29:Lab_tour#Statem ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  8 KB (1,147 words) - 16:16, 30 November 2017
• 20.109(F17):Communication
  *Review each of your main messages. ...the way a journal's editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting or not relevant.
  30 KB (4,511 words) - 15:37, 20 November 2017
• 20.109(F17):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(F17):Lab tour| lab orientation exercises]] to prepare for the #*Review and reserve a journal article from the options provided, or submit your own
  21 KB (3,308 words) - 19:34, 27 October 2017
• 20.109(F17):Develop experiment to optimize loading variables (Day2)
  Review these [[Media: CometAssay_M1D6stats_F14.xlsx | data]] from an experiment wh
  14 KB (2,296 words) - 14:28, 15 September 2017
• Using nonlinear regression to create a camera specification sheet
  ==Regression concepts review==
  30 KB (4,871 words) - 20:23, 29 August 2018
• Assignment 7 Overview
  ...ntary olives. See the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|this wiki page]] for a review of the temperature-dependent equilibrium between single-stranded and double ...hermodynamics before (or if it has been a while since you have), see this review of [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics]] before you go on.
  13 KB (1,864 words) - 21:49, 3 April 2018
• Assignment 1, Part 2: Optics bootcamp
  * The object needs to be initialized by ''invoking'' its <tt>initalize</tt> method. Do this by ** Throughout the semester, you'll find helpful to review tips on [http://measurebiology.org/wiki/Recording,_displaying_and_saving_im
  20 KB (3,371 words) - 06:40, 31 January 2020
• 20.109(F17): M1 Data Summary
  *'''You will complete this assignment with your partner.''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F17):Lab_tour#Statement_ *Be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F17):_Assignments class late po
  11 KB (1,562 words) - 19:31, 11 October 2017
• Assignment 6 Overview
  This assignment requires an understanding of basic circuits. If you need to review circuit concepts, start with the [[Electronics Primer]] page. If you have a
  3 KB (432 words) - 12:51, 14 October 2018
• 20.109(F17):Design gRNA for CRISPRi (Day2)
  With your laboratory partner, review [[Media:MetEngEcoli review.pdf |Metabolic engineering of ''Escherichia coli'' for production of mixed-
  13 KB (2,115 words) - 20:47, 17 October 2017
• 20.109(F17):Journal club II (Day 6)
  '''You will complete this assignment individually.''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F17):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your talk be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F17):Communication#Oral_communi
  10 KB (1,586 words) - 05:39, 20 October 2017
• 20.109(F17):Cathode construction (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  10 KB (1,581 words) - 17:02, 22 August 2017
• 20.109(F17):Research proposal presentation
  *review/preview structure of talk * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  15 KB (2,374 words) - 18:49, 17 November 2017
• 20.109(F17): M1 Mini-presentation
  *'''''You will complete this assignment individually.''''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F17):Lab_tour#Statement_ *Be sure to review the [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F17):_Assignments class late po
  4 KB (652 words) - 19:30, 6 September 2017
• 20.109(F17):Test role of biochemical factors in genomic stability (Day4)
  ... description of the BER pathway, read [[Media:Fa16 M1 BER review.pdf| this review]] by Robertson ''et al.''
  12 KB (1,986 words) - 21:55, 21 September 2017
• 20.109(F17): Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F16):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme *'''You will complete this assignment individually.''' Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F16):Lab_tour#Statement_
  8 KB (1,240 words) - 16:23, 15 November 2017
• 20.109(F17):Examine sub-nuclear foci abundance to measure DNA damage (Day6)
  #Review the generated images.
  15 KB (2,329 words) - 15:22, 4 October 2017
• Assignment 2 Part 1: Noise in images
  If you are a bit rusty on probability concepts, review [[Review of probability concepts| this page]] before you go on.
  24 KB (3,859 words) - 20:38, 18 February 2020
• Assignment 4 part 2: Measure resolution
  ===Review===
  24 KB (3,552 words) - 19:42, 28 February 2020
• 20.109(S18): Spring 2018 schedule
  ...ed.pdf| Quiz Review&T/R Prelab]]<br>[[Media: Sp18_M3D1_JBmarked.pdf | Quiz Review&W/F Prelab]]
  12 KB (1,806 words) - 02:26, 14 May 2018
• 20.109(S18):Practice tissue culture techniques and prepare cells for RNA purification (Day1)
  As you prepare to work in the tissue culture room, review the following resource:
  13 KB (2,165 words) - 13:44, 20 March 2018
• 20.109(S18):Laboratory tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t Review the following resources before you complete the tasks in Sections #8:
  26 KB (4,362 words) - 21:39, 6 February 2018
• 20.109(S18):Journal club presentations (Day6 and 7)
  ...>'''You will complete this assignment individually.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S18):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your talk be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S18):Communication| Communication ta
  15 KB (2,395 words) - 15:10, 28 June 2018
• 20.109(S18):Induce DNA damage and apply drug treatments for RNA purification (Day2)
  Lastly, to provide context for your research you will review the following journal article concerning the BRCA2-/- cell line and answer #Review Figure 2 and the following results sub-sections: RAD51 focus formation, Chr
  7 KB (1,179 words) - 14:24, 14 March 2018
• 20.109(S18): Biomaterials engineering mini-report
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S18):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (541 words) - 15:59, 6 January 2018
• 20.109(S18): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109%28F18%29:Lab_tour#Statem ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  12 KB (1,814 words) - 19:30, 31 August 2018
• 20.109(S18): Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S18):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S18):Communication| Communication ta
  27 KB (4,131 words) - 18:31, 31 January 2018
• 20.109(S18):Research proposal presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S18):Communication| Communication ta * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  12 KB (2,079 words) - 21:19, 10 January 2018
• 20.109(S18):Construct cathode with phage-based active material (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  10 KB (1,562 words) - 15:43, 27 April 2018
• 20.109(S18):Induce DNA damage and apply drug treatments for cell viability and identification of regulatory motifs in RNA-seq data (Day8)
  #Review your data posted on the [[20.109(S18):Class data| Class data page]]. ...r amplification cycle at which SYBR Green fluorescent signal was detected (review [[20.109(S18):Investigate RNA-seq data using public databases (Day5)| M2D5
  7 KB (1,061 words) - 02:15, 11 April 2018
• 20.109(S18):Analyze RNA-seq data and prepare for quantitative PCR experiment (Day 4)
  #*Review the list of the search results, and select one that is appropriate for our #Review the information provided on the page.
  8 KB (1,254 words) - 19:38, 21 March 2018
• 20.109(S18):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(S18):Laboratory tour| Laboratory Orientation exercises]] to pr #*For additional help, review the prelab and the entry you generated with the teaching faculty for M1D1.
  23 KB (3,594 words) - 18:41, 3 May 2018
• 20.109(S18): M1 Data Summary
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S18):Communication| Communication ta Please review the Title and Abstract [[Media:20.109 Workshop 2 - Abstract draft worksheet
  9 KB (1,376 words) - 16:05, 10 March 2018
• 20.109(S18): M1 Mini-presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S18):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (602 words) - 19:10, 6 January 2018
• 20.109(S18):Complete data analysis (Day7)
  ...ill use are confidence intervals (CI) and the Student's t-test. To begin, review the following definitions: Review [[Media: CometAssay_M1D6stats_F14.xlsx | '''these data''']] from an experim
  5 KB (767 words) - 21:44, 25 January 2018
• 20.109(S17):Complete cell viability assay (Day9)
  #Review your data posted on the [[20.109(S18):Class data| Class data page]].
  3 KB (544 words) - 15:29, 13 April 2018
• 20.109(F18):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(F18):Lab tour| lab orientation exercises]] to prepare for the #*For additional help, review the prelab and the entry you generated with the teaching faculty for M1D1.
  22 KB (3,505 words) - 21:06, 21 August 2019
• 20.109(F18): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109%28F18%29:Lab_tour#Statem ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  13 KB (1,821 words) - 16:07, 5 December 2018
• 20.109(F18):Lab tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t Review the following resources before you complete the tasks in Sections #8:
  27 KB (4,435 words) - 19:28, 6 September 2018
• 20.109(F18): Mini-report
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S18):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (543 words) - 19:49, 23 August 2018
• 20.109(F18):Design gRNA for CRISPRi (Day2)
  With your laboratory partner, review [[Media:MetEngEcoli review.pdf |Metabolic engineering of ''Escherichia coli'' for production of mixed-
  13 KB (2,112 words) - 15:29, 25 October 2018
• 20.109(F18):Journal club presentation (Day4 and 6)
  ...>'''You will complete this assignment individually.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F18):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your talk be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F18):Communication| Communication ta
  12 KB (1,816 words) - 19:15, 23 October 2018
• 20.109(F18):Construct cathode with phage-based active material (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  10 KB (1,564 words) - 15:47, 28 June 2018
• 20.109(F18):Research proposal presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F18):Communication| Communication ta * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  12 KB (2,081 words) - 19:49, 23 August 2018
• 20.109(F18): Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F18):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F18):Communication| Communication ta
  27 KB (4,087 words) - 01:33, 8 November 2018
• 20.109(F18):Practice statistical analysis methods and complete data analysis (Day7)
  ...ill use are confidence intervals (CI) and the Student's t-test. To begin, review the following definitions: Review [[Media: CometAssay_M1D6stats_F14.xlsx | '''these data''']] from an experim
  16 KB (2,655 words) - 19:34, 4 October 2018
• 20.109(F18):Prepare and treat cells for genomic instability experiment (Day3)
  ...ring damage before a mutation results. Recall the lecture material as you review the image below.
  9 KB (1,587 words) - 22:12, 20 September 2018
• 20.109(F18):Design cell loading optimization experiment and discuss genomic instability experiment (Day2)
  #*Review Fig. 3. In the results section, the authors state that the "SF2 values cal #*Review Fig. 4 and 5. What do these data suggest concerning the role of DNAPKcs in
  16 KB (2,668 words) - 17:38, 25 September 2018
• 20.109(F18):Analyze genomic instability experiment data and treat cells for sub-nuclear foci assay (Day5)
  #Review the generated images.
  10 KB (1,556 words) - 18:29, 27 September 2018
• 20.109(F18): Mini-presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F18):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (604 words) - 20:02, 2 October 2018
• 20.109(F18): Data Summary
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F18):Communication| Communication ta Please review the Title and Abstract [[Media:20.109 Workshop 2 - Abstract draft worksheet
  11 KB (1,571 words) - 20:03, 2 October 2018
• Electronics boot camp I: passive circuits and transfer functions
  ...o review circuit concepts, start with the [[Electronics Primer]] page, and review your answers to [[Assignment 6, Part 2: electronics written problems]].
  1 KB (167 words) - 17:22, 23 January 2020
• 20.109(S20):Journal club presentation (Day4 and 6)
  ...>'''You will complete this assignment individually.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S19):Laboratory_tour#Sta As you prepare your talk be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S19):Communication| Communication ta
  14 KB (2,050 words) - 20:18, 8 March 2020
• 20.109(S19): M1 Mini-presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S19):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (599 words) - 18:14, 29 January 2019
• 20.109(S19):Laboratory tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t Review the following resources before you complete the tasks in Sections #8:
  27 KB (4,454 words) - 15:43, 6 February 2019
• 20.109(S19): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109%28F18%29:Lab_tour#Statem ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  13 KB (1,840 words) - 20:47, 10 April 2019
• 20.109(S19):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(S19):Laboratory tour| Laboratory Orientation exercises]] to pr #*For additional help, review the prelab and the entry you generated with the teaching faculty for M1D1.
  24 KB (3,715 words) - 01:02, 30 April 2019
• 20.109(S19):Research proposal presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S19):Communication| Communication ta * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  12 KB (2,079 words) - 19:33, 29 January 2019
• 20.109(S19): Mini-report
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S19):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (542 words) - 19:33, 29 January 2019
• 20.109(S19):Construct cathode with phage-based active material (Day3)
  ===Part 2: Research proposal review exercise=== '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  10 KB (1,562 words) - 17:59, 29 January 2019
• 20.109(S19): Data Summary
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S19):Communication| Communication ta Please review the Title and Abstract [[Media:20.109 Workshop 2 - Abstract draft worksheet
  10 KB (1,422 words) - 14:19, 12 March 2019
• 20.109(S19): Mini-presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S18):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (599 words) - 18:16, 29 January 2019
• 20.109(S19):In silico cloning and confirmation digest of protein expression vector(Day1)
  ...ng video [http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/labs/pcr/ linked here] to review the details of PCR.
  22 KB (3,675 words) - 19:34, 25 February 2019
• 20.109(S19):Complete data analysis (Day7)
  ...ill use are confidence intervals (CI) and the Student's t-test. To begin, review the following definitions: Review [[Media: CometAssay_M1D6stats_F14.xlsx | '''these data''']] from an experim
  5 KB (766 words) - 15:55, 31 January 2019
• 20.109(S19):Practice tissue culture techniques and prepare cells for RNA purification (Day1)
  As you prepare to work in the tissue culture room, review the following resource: Lastly, to provide context for your research you will review the following journal article concerning the BRCA2-/- cell line and answer
  14 KB (2,344 words) - 20:32, 16 April 2019
• 20.109(S19):Analyze RNA-seq data and prepare for quantitative PCR experiment (Day 4)
  #*Review the list of the search results, and select one that is appropriate for our #Review the information provided on the page.
  7 KB (1,159 words) - 13:39, 19 March 2019
• 20.109(S19):Journal club presentations (Day7 and 8)
  ...>'''You will complete this assignment individually.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S19):Laboratory_tour#Sta As you prepare your talk be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S19):Communication| Communication ta
  15 KB (2,407 words) - 00:58, 4 April 2019
• 20.109(S19):Complete data analysis (Day9)
  #Review your data posted on the [[20.109(S19):Class data| Class data page]]. ...r amplification cycle at which SYBR Green fluorescent signal was detected (review [[20.109(S18):Investigate RNA-seq data using public databases (Day5)| M2D5
  6 KB (1,002 words) - 14:48, 9 April 2019
• 20.109(S19): Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S18):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S19):Communication| Communication ta
  27 KB (4,062 words) - 19:40, 19 April 2019
• 20.109(F19):Practice cell culture and begin sub-nuclear foci assay (Day1)
  Review the following resource before you complete the tasks detailed in this exerc
  14 KB (2,233 words) - 16:30, 9 September 2019
• 20.109(F19):Lab tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t
  27 KB (4,413 words) - 20:37, 30 August 2019
• 20.109(F19):Design gRNA for CRISPRi (Day2)
  With your laboratory partner, review [[Media:MetEngEcoli review.pdf |Metabolic engineering of ''Escherichia coli'' for production of mixed-
  13 KB (2,121 words) - 13:56, 13 September 2019
• 20.109(F19):Design gRNA sequence for CRISPRi (Day2)
  With your laboratory partner, review [[Media:MetEngEcoli review.pdf |Metabolic engineering of ''Escherichia coli'' for production of mixed-
  13 KB (2,116 words) - 18:52, 14 August 2019
• 20.109(F19):Journal club presentation (Day4 and 6)
  ...>'''You will complete this assignment individually.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F19):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your talk be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F19):Communication| Communication ta
  12 KB (1,792 words) - 20:23, 22 October 2019
• 20.109(F19):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(F19):Lab tour| laboratory tour exercises]] to prepare for the #*For additional help, review the prelab and the entry you generated with the teaching faculty for M1D1.
  22 KB (3,438 words) - 17:37, 16 October 2019
• 20.109(F19): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109%28F19%29:Lab_tour#Statem ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  13 KB (1,813 words) - 16:14, 16 October 2019
• 20.109(F19):Research proposal presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F19):Communication| Communication ta * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  12 KB (2,081 words) - 19:26, 5 November 2019
• 20.109(F19): Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F18):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F19):Communication| Communication ta
  27 KB (4,080 words) - 23:37, 11 November 2019
• 20.109(F19):Practice statistical analysis methods and complete data analysis (Day7)
  ...ill use are confidence intervals (CI) and the Student's t-test. To begin, review the following definitions: Review [[Media: CometAssay_M1D6stats_F14.xlsx | '''these data''']] from an experim
  7 KB (1,189 words) - 19:54, 2 October 2019
• 20.109(F19): Mini-presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F19):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (625 words) - 13:07, 19 July 2020
• 20.109(F19):Image CometChip (Day6)
  ... To assist you in the preparation of your first major assignment, we will review the main concepts covered in this module. Remember, DNA damage is defined ... description of the BER pathway, read [[Media:Fa16 M1 BER review.pdf| this review]] by Robertson ''et al.''
  10 KB (1,633 words) - 14:08, 1 October 2019
• 20.109(F19): Data Summary
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F19):Communication| Communication ta Please review the Title and Abstract [[Media:20.109 Workshop 2 - Abstract draft worksheet
  10 KB (1,466 words) - 18:34, 23 October 2019
• 20.109(F19):Prepare for cellular thermal shift assay (Day1)
  ...he previously completed assays is below. You will use this information to review the data collected in previous semesters, then you will select a ligand to
  14 KB (2,315 words) - 16:18, 7 November 2019
• 20.109(F19):Complete antibody staining for Western blot analysis (Day4)
  '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  8 KB (1,322 words) - 22:58, 9 September 2019
• 20.109(F19): Mini-report
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F19):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (563 words) - 18:12, 3 December 2019
• 20.109(S20): Spring 2020 schedule
  ...and modifications have been made to the remainder of the schedule. Please review the details below and, as always, feel free to share feedback...now more th ...9(S20):Perform qPCR experiment and continue RNA-seq data analysis (Day7) | Review qPCR experiment and complete statistical analysis]]<br>[https://mit.zoom.us
  17 KB (2,729 words) - 21:02, 6 May 2020
• Assignment 6 Overview: two color microscope
  ...rcuit building in the lab, the lectures need a bit of time to catch up and review basic circuit elements. You'll start to practice solving basic circuit prob
  3 KB (480 words) - 01:11, 9 April 2020
• 20.109(S20):Laboratory tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t
  27 KB (4,434 words) - 14:55, 5 February 2020
• 20.109(S20): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(S20):Laboratory_tour#Statement_on_collaboration_and_int ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  13 KB (1,823 words) - 14:33, 18 March 2020
• 20.109(S20):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(S20):Laboratory tour| Laboratory Orientation exercises]] to pr ...s of completion or your training record which can be found at "My Training Needs" on Atlas. To access, go to atlas.mit.edu then click the Learning Center t
  24 KB (3,726 words) - 16:31, 25 April 2020
• 20.109(S20):Module 2
  ...9(S20):Perform qPCR experiment and continue RNA-seq data analysis (Day7) | Review qPCR experiment and complete statistical analysis]]<br>
  3 KB (501 words) - 21:05, 17 March 2020
• 20.109(S20):Identify clones to characterize (Day3)
  ...eatures identified by SnapGene in your laboratory notebook. If you need to review basic tools in SnapGene remember our exercise on [[http://engineerbiology.o ===Part 3: Research proposal review exercise===
  14 KB (2,253 words) - 14:41, 21 April 2020
• 20.109(S20): Data Summary
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S20):Communication| Communication ta Please review the Title and Abstract worksheet and rubric from the BE Communication Lab
  9 KB (1,342 words) - 20:05, 20 March 2020
• 20.109(S20):Prepare cells for RNA purification and practice RNA-seq data analysis methods (Day1)
  As you prepare to work in the tissue culture room, review the following resource:
  13 KB (2,111 words) - 21:39, 1 March 2020
• 20.109(S20):Scan SMM slides to identify binders of TDP43 protein (Day5)
  ===Part 2: Review journal article===
  5 KB (831 words) - 21:04, 21 February 2020
• 20.109(S20):Examine TDP43 binders for chemical features (Day7)
  With your partner, review the hits identified in the SMM. It may be easier to copy / paste the small
  5 KB (754 words) - 19:01, 2 March 2020
• 20.109(S20):Journal club presentations (Day4 and 5)
  ...>'''You will complete this assignment individually.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S20):Laboratory_tour#Sta As you prepare your talk be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S20):Communication| Communication ta
  18 KB (2,824 words) - 21:51, 7 April 2020
• 20.109(S20): Mini-presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S20):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (626 words) - 16:15, 31 January 2020
• 20.109(S20):Analyze RNA-seq data and select gene targets for quantitative PCR (qPCR) experiment (Day 6)
  ...olor = #0f688c >'''Welcome back!! To ensure we all are ready to go, let's review RNA-seq. In addition to reading the text provided in the Introduction, ple ...9(S20):Perform qPCR experiment and continue RNA-seq data analysis (Day7) | Review qPCR experiment and complete statistical analysis]]<br>
  6 KB (992 words) - 12:27, 2 April 2020
• 20.109(S20):Perform qPCR experiment and continue RNA-seq data analysis (Day7)
  <font color = #0f688c >'''Before reading through the protocol below, please review the video provided by Sigma-Aldrich which describes qPCR reaction and how t ===Part 1: Review qPCR experimental procedures===
  14 KB (2,171 words) - 15:02, 2 April 2020
• 20.109(S20):Examine qPCR results and complete data analysis (Day8)
  ...9(S20):Perform qPCR experiment and continue RNA-seq data analysis (Day7) | Review qPCR experiment and complete statistical analysis]]<br>
  5 KB (856 words) - 18:14, 28 March 2020
• 20.109(S20):Research proposal presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S20):Communication| Communication ta * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
  12 KB (2,106 words) - 15:56, 26 March 2020
• 20.109(S20): Mini-report
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F19):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (575 words) - 15:53, 21 April 2020
• 20.109(S20): Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S20):Laboratory_tour#Sta As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S20):Communication| Communication ta
  27 KB (4,110 words) - 16:15, 8 April 2020
• 20.109(F20):Lab tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t ...pecific types of culture vessels and tools that are used. For now, please review the information regarding the important equipment below:
  27 KB (4,406 words) - 17:48, 31 August 2020
• 20.109(F20): Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F20):Lab_tour#Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity| ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  13 KB (1,850 words) - 15:48, 2 October 2020
• 20.109(F20):M1D1
  Review the following resource before you complete the tasks detailed in this exerc Review and discuss the Abstract and Introduction from the following journal articl
  10 KB (1,598 words) - 23:22, 1 September 2020
• 20.109(F20):M1D2
  ...to hazardous compounds. Before we discuss the specific experiments, let's review the important background information. ... description of the BER pathway, read [[Media:Fa16 M1 BER review.pdf| this review]] by Robertson ''et al.''
  11 KB (1,764 words) - 14:46, 10 September 2020
• 20.109(F20):M1D5
  ... to assess DNA damage: the &gamma;H2AX assay and the CometChip. Before we review the CometChip experimental details, it is best to familiarize yourself with
  15 KB (2,489 words) - 22:13, 17 September 2020
• 20.109(F20):M3D1
  ...ts were selected for the metabolic engineering approach. Second, you will review the CRISPRi technology used for the metabolic engineering approach. ===Part 1: Review ''E. coli'' anaerobic fermentative metabolism===
  9 KB (1,441 words) - 18:34, 22 July 2020
• 20.109(F20):M1D7
  ...use are confidence intervals (CI) and the Student's ''t''-test. To begin, review the following definitions: Review data from an experiment where cells were exposed to increasing amounts of r
  8 KB (1,235 words) - 15:55, 24 September 2020
• 20.109(F20):M1D6
  #Review the generated images. *Review the data in the .txt files for two macrowells per treatment condition (no H
  13 KB (2,151 words) - 14:28, 14 September 2020
• 20.109(F20):M2D3
  ...roteins are the molecules most often studied with this technique; agarose (review M2D1!) and acrylamide gels are the two most common sieves. The molecules to #Review the SDS-PAGE results below (image also linked [[Media:Fa20 M2D3 SDSPAGE ima
  15 KB (2,402 words) - 21:45, 18 August 2020
• 20.109(F20):M2D5
  ===Part 3: Review journal article===
  7 KB (1,070 words) - 22:12, 13 October 2020
• 20.109(F20):Mini-presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F20):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (624 words) - 19:24, 25 July 2020
• 20.109(F20):M3D5
  Your first task for today is to review the data analysis you completed on M3D3 and decide which datasets you will
  8 KB (1,355 words) - 00:08, 31 July 2020
• 20.109(F20):M3D3
  ===Part 1: Review experimental setup for ethanol yield assay=== ...b]]Before we look at the specific conditions that were tested, let's first review how anaerobic and aerobic cultures were maintained. Rather than using anae
  17 KB (2,786 words) - 02:59, 20 August 2020
• 20.109(F20):M3D2
  ... to best target a gene using the CRISPRi system. The goal for today is to review the strategy used in constructing an expression plasmid that encodes the sg ...ed using primers and PCR in the procedure described in Part 2. Before you review the approach used to insert the sgRNA sequence, first familiarize yourself
  17 KB (2,660 words) - 23:58, 30 July 2020
• 20.109(F20):Data Summary
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F20):Communication| Communication ta Please review the Title and Abstract and from the BE Communication Lab workshop.
  9 KB (1,364 words) - 19:21, 25 July 2020
• 20.109(F20):Journal club presentation
  ...>'''You will complete this assignment individually.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F20):Lab_tour#Statement_ ...atch?v=Hp7Id3Yb9XQ Designing effective scientific presentations]. Lastly, review the Journal club presentation Evaluation rubric (linked [[Media:JC presenta
  14 KB (1,998 words) - 16:58, 6 October 2020
• 20.109(F20):Research proposal presentation
  * Read a recent review paper. This approach is one of the quickest ways to develop sufficient expe ...perts in the subject area. This is more fun and interactive than reading a review paper for honing in on research gaps! But don't expect them to do all the w
  11 KB (1,760 words) - 19:35, 27 July 2020
• 20.109(F20):Mini-report
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F20):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (578 words) - 18:10, 6 December 2020
• 20.109(F20):M3D4
  '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  16 KB (2,633 words) - 15:58, 4 December 2020
• 20.109(F20):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(F20):Lab tour| Orientation and laboratory tour exercises]] to ...s of completion or your training record which can be found at "My Training Needs" on Atlas. To access, go to atlas.mit.edu then click the Learning Center t
  21 KB (3,359 words) - 19:41, 21 September 2020
• 20.109(F20):M2D7
  With your partner, review the hits identified in the SMM. It may be easier to copy / paste the small
  7 KB (1,049 words) - 21:02, 29 October 2020
• 20.109(F20):Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F20):Lab_tour#Statement_ As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F20):Communication| Communication ta
  27 KB (4,067 words) - 18:54, 25 July 2020
• In silico cloning of pdCas9 construct
  #Arber and Linn. "DNA modification and restriction." ''Annual Review of Biochemistry.'' (1969) 38:467–500. PMID: [http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.g #Boyer. "DNA restriction and modification mechanisms in bacteria." ''Annual Review of Microbiology.'' (1971) 25:153-176. PMID: [http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  19 KB (3,021 words) - 20:40, 3 August 2020
• 20.109(S21):Spring 2021 schedule
  | [[20.109(S21):M3D1 |Review IPC literature and examine structural characteristics]] <br> [[Media:Sp21 M
  11 KB (1,796 words) - 16:40, 12 May 2021
• 20.109(S21):M1D2
  During lab we will review and discuss Boder, E. T., et al. "[[Media:BoderE_WittrupKD.pdf |Yeast surfa
  18 KB (2,876 words) - 15:37, 1 March 2021
• 20.109(S21):M1D4
  ...ion method called alkaline lysis. In the last lab section, for yeast there needs to be one additional step to help break down the cell wall, but overall goa #*If you need to review basic tools in SnapGene remember our exercise on [http://engineerbiology.or
  16 KB (2,486 words) - 14:37, 3 March 2021
• 20.109(S21):M1D7
  # Open the code in Matlab and review the first few lines in the editor window.
  15 KB (2,498 words) - 17:47, 17 March 2021
• 20.109(S21):Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(S21):Laboratory_tour#Statement_on_collaboration_and_int ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  14 KB (2,009 words) - 21:40, 18 February 2021
• 20.109(S21):Laboratory tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t ...pecific types of culture vessels and tools that are used. For now, please review the information regarding the important equipment below:
  28 KB (4,443 words) - 16:02, 16 February 2021
• 20.109(S21):M2D2
  ...t is dependent on the features that were added during the cloning process (review your notes from M2D1 prelab discussion!). The molecular weight of TDP43-RRM #Review the SDS-PAGE results below (the images are linked here so you can create a
  16 KB (2,534 words) - 11:50, 26 March 2021
• 20.109(S21):M2D3
  ===Part 4: Review journal article=== Review and critically discuss the following journal article with your laboratory p
  14 KB (2,241 words) - 18:42, 26 January 2021
• 20.109(S21):M2D5
  Review the following resource before you complete the tasks detailed in this exerc
  11 KB (1,878 words) - 23:14, 27 April 2021
• 20.109(S21):M2D4
  With your partner, review the hits identified in the SMM. It may be easier to copy / paste the small
  12 KB (1,974 words) - 19:50, 31 March 2021
• 20.109(S21):Homework
  #Review the [[20.109(S21):Laboratory tour| Orientation and laboratory tour exercise ...s of completion or your training record which can be found at "My Training Needs" on Atlas. To access, go to atlas.mit.edu then click the Learning Center t
  22 KB (3,518 words) - 17:12, 22 April 2021
• 20.109(S21):M2D6
  In total, five small molecules were assessed using CETSA. Review the information in the table below and select two small molecules for which *Review the groupings that you assigned based on the features in the small molecule
  16 KB (2,706 words) - 21:00, 22 April 2021
• 20.109(S21):M2D7
  Next day: [[20.109(S21):M3D1 |Review inverse pericam (IPC) cloning strategy ]] <br>
  10 KB (1,654 words) - 19:21, 22 April 2021
• 20.109(S21):Mini-presentation
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S21):Communication| Communication ta
  5 KB (694 words) - 22:16, 1 February 2021
• 20.109(S21):Data Summary
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S21):Communication| Communication ta Please review the Title and Abstract presentation from the BE Communication Lab workshop.
  10 KB (1,476 words) - 03:01, 16 March 2021
• 20.109(S21):M3D3
  ...rve is used to calculate <math>K_d</math> of IPC binding to calcium! As a review, consider the simple case of a receptor-ligand pair that are exclusive to e #Obtain a black 96-well plate and review the plate map schematic at right: the top two rows will be loaded with WT I
  18 KB (3,041 words) - 15:12, 4 May 2021
• 20.109(S21):Module 3
  M3D1: [[20.109(S21):M3D1 |Review IPC literature and examine structural characteristics]] <br>
  4 KB (610 words) - 19:44, 21 April 2021
• 20.109(S21):M3D1
  ===Part 1: Review IPC reference article=== ...xamine the effect of these mutations on the activity of IPC, we will first review how the original IPC sensor was constructed.
  16 KB (2,593 words) - 17:57, 27 April 2021
• 20.109(S21):M3D2
  ...l consider the mutations that were generated in IPC by previous 109ers and review how IPC and the IPC variants were expressed and purified as this is the fir ...ator sequence and transcription occurs unimpeded. For more details please review to the [[20.109(S21):M2D1#Introduction |M2D1 Introduction]]! Another simil
  12 KB (2,031 words) - 19:37, 29 April 2021
• 20.109(S21):Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S21):Laboratory_tour#Sta As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S21):Communication| Communication ta
  27 KB (4,070 words) - 13:25, 27 January 2021
• 20.109(S21):Journal club presentation
  ...>'''You will complete this assignment individually.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(S21):Laboratory_tour#Sta ...atch?v=Hp7Id3Yb9XQ Designing effective scientific presentations]. Lastly, review the Journal club presentation Evaluation rubric (linked [[Media:JC presenta
  15 KB (2,231 words) - 01:11, 6 April 2021
• 20.109(S21):Research proposal presentation
  * Read a recent review paper. This approach is one of the quickest ways to develop sufficient expe ...perts in the subject area. This is more fun and interactive than reading a review paper for honing in on research gaps! But don't expect them to do all the w
  11 KB (1,758 words) - 13:40, 27 January 2021
• 20.109(S21):Mini-report
  As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(S21):Communication| Communication ta
  4 KB (636 words) - 16:17, 13 May 2021
• 20.109(F21):Module 2
  M2D1: [[20.109(F21):M2D1 |Review small molecule microarray (SMM) experiment and results ]]<br>
  5 KB (683 words) - 03:26, 31 October 2021
• 20.109(F21):Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F21):Laboratory_tour#Statement_on_collaboration_and_int ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  13 KB (1,949 words) - 18:33, 1 October 2021
• 20.109(S21):M3D4
  ===Part 1: Review site-directed mutagenesis=== Your first task for today is to review the data analysis you completed on M3D3 and decide which Variant IPC data y
  11 KB (1,857 words) - 18:30, 11 May 2021
• 20.109(F21):Fall 2021 schedule
  | [[20.109(F21):M2D1 |Review small molecule microarray (SMM) experiment and results ]]<br> [[Media:Fa21
  11 KB (1,750 words) - 21:15, 1 December 2021
• Develop Research proposal ideas and presentations
  '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  6 KB (863 words) - 16:48, 26 April 2021
• 20.109(F21):Homework
  *Review the [[20.109(F21):Laboratory tour| Orientation and laboratory tour exercise ...s of completion or your training record which can be found at "My Training Needs" on Atlas. To access, go to atlas.mit.edu then click the Learning Center t
  36 KB (5,868 words) - 18:44, 3 November 2021
• 20.109(F21):Participate in Research proposal peer reviews
  '''Outline of the peer review exercise:'''
  4 KB (652 words) - 18:28, 9 August 2021
• 20.109(F21):M1D1
  Review the following resource before you complete the tasks detailed in this exerc Review and discuss the Abstract and Introduction from the following journal articl
  11 KB (1,852 words) - 14:54, 4 August 2021
• 20.109(F21):Laboratory tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t
  34 KB (5,598 words) - 20:50, 9 September 2021
• 20.109(F21):M2D1
  ===Part 1: Review SMM experimental details=== ...ay. To ensure that you are familiar with the steps used in an SMM screen, review the procedure below.
  17 KB (2,791 words) - 20:00, 15 November 2021
• 20.109(F21):M2D2
  Previous day: [[20.109(F21):M2D1 |Review small molecule microarray (SMM) experiment and results ]]<br>
  21 KB (3,498 words) - 19:42, 15 October 2021
• 20.109(F21):M1D7
  ...use are confidence intervals (CI) and the Student's ''t''-test. To begin, review the following definitions: Review data from an experiment where cells were exposed to increasing amounts of r
  8 KB (1,227 words) - 18:35, 6 October 2021
• 20.109(F21):Data Summary
  Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F21):Laboratory_tour#Sta As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F21):Communication| Communication ta
  9 KB (1,364 words) - 00:24, 7 August 2021
• 20.109(F21):Research talk
  Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F21):Laboratory_tour#Sta As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F21):Communication| Communication ta
  5 KB (691 words) - 00:24, 8 August 2021
• 20.109(F21):Journal club presentation
  Please review the 20.109 [http://engineerbiology.org/wiki/20.109(F21):Laboratory_tour#Sta ...atch?v=Hp7Id3Yb9XQ Designing effective scientific presentations]. Lastly, review the Journal club presentation Evaluation rubric (linked [[Media:JC presenta
  14 KB (2,095 words) - 03:04, 15 October 2021
• 20.109(F21):Research proposal presentation
  * Read a recent review paper. This approach is one of the quickest ways to develop sufficient expe ...perts in the subject area. This is more fun and interactive than reading a review paper for honing in on research gaps! But don't expect them to do all the w
  11 KB (1,781 words) - 16:41, 28 July 2021
• 20.109(F21):Research article
  Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F21):Laboratory_tour#Statement_on_collaboration_and_int As you prepare your assignment be sure to review the resources provided on the [[20.109(F21):Communication| Communication ta
  27 KB (4,141 words) - 13:24, 8 August 2021
• 20.109(F21):M1D2
  ...to hazardous compounds. Before we discuss the specific experiments, let's review the important background information. ... description of the BER pathway, read [[Media:Fa16 M1 BER review.pdf| this review]] by Robertson ''et al.''
  12 KB (1,934 words) - 18:42, 17 September 2021
• 20.109(F21):M1D3
  ...ted cells. If you would like to review concepts used in this code, please review a protocol written by researchers at Duke University outlined [https://micr
  23 KB (3,807 words) - 20:07, 28 September 2021
• 20.109(F21):M1D5
  Please review assignment description (linked [[20.109(F21):Data_Summary|here]]). Please review assignment description (linked [[20.109(F21):Research_talk|here]]).
  4 KB (693 words) - 12:23, 28 September 2021
• 20.109(F21):M1D4
  ... to assess DNA damage: the &gamma;H2AX assay and the CometChip. Before we review the CometChip experimental details, it is best to familiarize yourself with
  15 KB (2,480 words) - 15:38, 23 September 2021
• 20.109(F21):M2D4
  ...roteins are the molecules most often studied with this technique; agarose (review M2D2!) and acrylamide gels are the two most common sieves. The molecules to #Review the SDS-PAGE results below (image also linked [[Media:Fa20 M2D3 SDSPAGE ima
  15 KB (2,345 words) - 18:33, 21 October 2021
• 20.109(F21):M2D5
  ... is linked [[Media:Fa21 M2D5 Biotinylation protocol.pdf| here]] for you to review during any downtime in class today.
  8 KB (1,286 words) - 18:07, 2 November 2021
• 20.109(F21):M2D6
  ...ssessing the K_D and the association / dissociation rates. As a review of the key concepts, consider the simple case of a receptor-ligand pair tha Review the short tutorial videos on processing BLI data sets (available [https://w
  7 KB (1,086 words) - 17:13, 3 November 2021
• 20.109(F21):M2D7
  ...ciation constants. Please refer to the handout from the previous class to review this information!
  11 KB (1,633 words) - 21:08, 9 November 2021
• 20.109(F21):Draft research question for major assignment
  ...st, perform a quick literature search to find recent papers in the field. Review 2-3 papers and discuss what is known, and more importantly, what is unknown
  2 KB (306 words) - 20:03, 9 August 2021
• 20.109(F21):M1D6
  #Review the generated images. *Review the data in the .txt files for two macrowells per treatment condition (no t
  12 KB (2,055 words) - 19:24, 30 September 2021
• 20.109(S22):Spring 2022 schedule
  | [[20.109(S22):M1D1 |Review small molecule microarray (SMM) technology]] <br> [[Media:Sp22 M1D1 bcm mar
  12 KB (1,899 words) - 16:41, 4 May 2022
• 20.109(S22):Laboratory tour
  #Click the links associated with each of the modules and briefly review the information on each tab. What type of information is linked to these t
  34 KB (5,639 words) - 21:02, 1 February 2022
• 20.109(S22):Assignments
  ...ow) and should reflect your personal understanding.'''</font color> Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(S22):Laboratory_tour#Statement_on_collaboration_and_int ...me together and get to know each other well. Everyone in the 20.109 family needs the support of their peers and instructors. If you find yourself in a situa
  13 KB (1,954 words) - 15:55, 28 April 2022
• 20.109(S22):Homework
  *Review the [[20.109(S22):Laboratory tour| Orientation and laboratory tour exercise ...s of completion or your training record which can be found at "My Training Needs" on Atlas. To access, go to atlas.mit.edu then click the Learning Center t
  36 KB (5,856 words) - 20:07, 15 March 2022
• 20.109(S22):M2D8
  Review the discussion from the M2D7 lecture and select the two datasets that you w
  3 KB (404 words) - 00:36, 12 April 2022
• 20.109(S22):M1D4
  ...cally think about what the expected band size is for each of the samples. Review the M1D3 prelab slides for the orientation of the components that makeup th
  12 KB (2,009 words) - 20:13, 15 February 2022
• 20.109(S22):M1D1
  ===Part 2: Review SMM experimental details=== ...ay. To ensure that you are familiar with the steps used in an SMM screen, review the procedure below.
  11 KB (1,869 words) - 18:57, 3 February 2022
• 20.109(S22):M1D2
  ...sing the criteria discussed in the prelab. In the exercises below you will review this process to gain a better understanding for how hits the hits identifie Review the hits that were identified in the SMM screen completed for TDP43-RRM12.
  19 KB (3,104 words) - 18:31, 4 February 2022
• 20.109(S22):M1D6
  Review the following resource before you complete the tasks detailed in this exerc
  11 KB (1,839 words) - 17:55, 24 February 2022
• 20.109(S22):M1D7
  ... the Instructors completed this, the protocol is included below for you to review.
  13 KB (2,069 words) - 18:57, 1 March 2022
• 20.109(S22):M3D1
  ...st, perform a quick literature search to find recent papers in the field. Review 2-3 papers and discuss what is known, and more importantly, what is unknown
  2 KB (334 words) - 18:50, 14 January 2022