Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • ...a much higher frequency. So rip that sucker off — now your amplifier needs to work on a signal that is changing much more quickly. ...iki page]] to become familiar with the software. You may find it useful to review the block diagram again on the [[Understanding the lock-in amplifier]] wiki
    20 KB (3,227 words) - 20:05, 7 November 2017
  • ...ntary olives. See the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|this wiki page]] for a review of the temperature-dependent equilibrium between single-stranded and double ...hermodynamics before (or if it has been a while since you have), see this review of [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics]] before you go on.
    10 KB (1,473 words) - 03:39, 13 April 2016
  • ...a much higher frequency. So rip that sucker off — now your amplifier needs to work on a signal that is changing much more quickly. ...iki page]] to become familiar with the software. You may find it useful to review the block diagram again on the [[Understanding the lock-in amplifier]] wiki
    17 KB (2,813 words) - 22:56, 7 November 2017
  • ==Review of electrical units and equations== ...itle=Electronics_Primer#Primary_definitions Primary definitions] and also review [http://measure.mit.edu/~20.309/wiki/index.php?title=Electronics_Primer#Con
    22 KB (3,534 words) - 13:50, 19 October 2018
  • [[Category:Needs review]]
    5 KB (714 words) - 16:37, 7 February 2020
  • ...perational principles of a commercial AFM. You may also find it helpful to review some of the ''[[Lab Manual: Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)#References|refere To be useful for imaging, an AFM needs to scan its probe over the sample surface. Our microscopes are designed wit
    56 KB (9,320 words) - 20:42, 13 December 2017
  • ...Mason1997.pdf Particle Tracking Microrheology of Complex Fluids]. Physical Review Letters, Volume 79, Number 17, 27 October 1997.
    810 B (94 words) - 18:03, 13 August 2013
  • ==Electronics Review==
    459 B (49 words) - 14:32, 23 August 2013
  • ...e not previously studied geometric optics or those in need of a refresher. Review sessions on electronics and linear systems will also be offered. The value of a careful literature review cannot be understated. This frequently neglected step can make the differen
    11 KB (1,722 words) - 17:22, 6 February 2018
  • *we have little electronics experience, and Jenn needs an electronics review :)
    4 KB (610 words) - 00:07, 3 April 2011
  • * review synthesizible and unsynthesizable commands
    3 KB (414 words) - 16:56, 15 April 2011
  • * Review particle tracking code
    690 B (93 words) - 02:09, 19 March 2011
  • * Review particle tracking code
    690 B (93 words) - 02:15, 19 March 2011
  • *Review the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|DNA Melting Thermodynamics Notes]]. *If you need a review of Matlab fundamentals, see [[Matlab:Matlab Fundamentals|Matlab Fundamental
    13 KB (2,026 words) - 22:46, 15 April 2018
  • ... suggested experiments for approximately $20,000. Based on our literature review, such a system does not currently exist.
    21 KB (3,664 words) - 21:38, 4 June 2015
  • Huang, B. a. (2009). Super resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annual review of biochemistry, 993-1016.
    2 KB (233 words) - 20:37, 19 May 2011
  • * [[A.Williams:_Objectives_and_Literature_Review| Objectives & Literature Review -- Ajoke Williams]]
    927 B (112 words) - 05:02, 18 May 2012
  • [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]<br/>
    2 KB (310 words) - 03:23, 20 May 2012
  • <h2> Objectives and Literature Review </h2>
    7 KB (1,162 words) - 07:22, 14 March 2012
  • <h4> Literature Review </h4>
    10 KB (1,500 words) - 08:41, 14 March 2012
  • #REDIRECT [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]
    58 B (7 words) - 14:39, 11 March 2012
  • ...llows the consumer to refocus the image before capturing a light field, to review all past photos still on the camera, and to refocus after capturing the ima
    18 KB (2,796 words) - 05:15, 18 May 2012
  • ==Review of linear regression==
    5 KB (774 words) - 18:07, 13 January 2014
  • This bootcamp requires an understanding of basic circuits. If you need to review circuit concepts, start with the [[Electronics Primer]] page. If you have a
    35 KB (5,891 words) - 18:46, 7 April 2017
  • [[Category:Needs review]] ==Concept review==
    793 B (95 words) - 21:35, 4 June 2015
  • ...l. Fortunately, there always seems to be somebody with a bigger office who needs a couch. ==Review of probability and statists concepts==
    24 KB (3,757 words) - 14:57, 3 September 2018
  • For a good review of geometrical optics, ray tracing, and some worked-out ray tracing example
    28 KB (4,857 words) - 20:09, 31 July 2017
  • ==Regression concepts review==
    30 KB (4,815 words) - 21:47, 27 December 2015
  • ... topic). Do your best to incorporate suggestions from the peer and faculty review.
    14 KB (2,255 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...l-biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    12 KB (2,006 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...ab partner. Begin by reading the [[Media:PeerReviewTips.pdf| tips for peer review]] from Neal Lerner. Then, as you read your lab partner's writing, be a thou ...uggestions for improvement whenever possible. Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner.
    16 KB (2,751 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    7 KB (1,208 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    27 KB (3,752 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be
    10 KB (1,692 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
    11 KB (1,738 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    12 KB (1,954 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ====Review Articles (for reference only)==== ====Review Articles (for reference only)====
    9 KB (1,472 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    22 KB (3,631 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (761 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,912 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    14 KB (2,336 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
    19 KB (3,251 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    22 KB (3,724 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    4 KB (732 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,849 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>
    19 KB (3,069 words) - 15:48, 15 June 2015
  • ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on
    9 KB (1,466 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    4 KB (600 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    9 KB (1,473 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over
    17 KB (2,960 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)