Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • ...a much higher frequency. So rip that sucker off — now your amplifier needs to work on a signal that is changing much more quickly. ...iki page]] to become familiar with the software. You may find it useful to review the block diagram again on the [[Understanding the lock-in amplifier]] wiki
    20 KB (3,227 words) - 20:05, 7 November 2017
  • ...ntary olives. See the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|this wiki page]] for a review of the temperature-dependent equilibrium between single-stranded and double ...hermodynamics before (or if it has been a while since you have), see this review of [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics]] before you go on.
    10 KB (1,473 words) - 03:39, 13 April 2016
  • ...a much higher frequency. So rip that sucker off — now your amplifier needs to work on a signal that is changing much more quickly. ...iki page]] to become familiar with the software. You may find it useful to review the block diagram again on the [[Understanding the lock-in amplifier]] wiki
    17 KB (2,813 words) - 22:56, 7 November 2017
  • ==Review of electrical units and equations== ...itle=Electronics_Primer#Primary_definitions Primary definitions] and also review [http://measure.mit.edu/~20.309/wiki/index.php?title=Electronics_Primer#Con
    22 KB (3,534 words) - 13:50, 19 October 2018
  • [[Category:Needs review]]
    5 KB (714 words) - 16:37, 7 February 2020
  • ...perational principles of a commercial AFM. You may also find it helpful to review some of the ''[[Lab Manual: Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)#References|refere To be useful for imaging, an AFM needs to scan its probe over the sample surface. Our microscopes are designed wit
    56 KB (9,320 words) - 20:42, 13 December 2017
  • ...Mason1997.pdf Particle Tracking Microrheology of Complex Fluids]. Physical Review Letters, Volume 79, Number 17, 27 October 1997.
    810 B (94 words) - 18:03, 13 August 2013
  • ==Electronics Review==
    459 B (49 words) - 14:32, 23 August 2013
  • ...e not previously studied geometric optics or those in need of a refresher. Review sessions on electronics and linear systems will also be offered. The value of a careful literature review cannot be understated. This frequently neglected step can make the differen
    11 KB (1,722 words) - 17:22, 6 February 2018
  • *we have little electronics experience, and Jenn needs an electronics review :)
    4 KB (610 words) - 00:07, 3 April 2011
  • * review synthesizible and unsynthesizable commands
    3 KB (414 words) - 16:56, 15 April 2011
  • * Review particle tracking code
    690 B (93 words) - 02:09, 19 March 2011
  • * Review particle tracking code
    690 B (93 words) - 02:15, 19 March 2011
  • *Review the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|DNA Melting Thermodynamics Notes]]. *If you need a review of Matlab fundamentals, see [[Matlab:Matlab Fundamentals|Matlab Fundamental
    13 KB (2,026 words) - 22:46, 15 April 2018
  • ... suggested experiments for approximately $20,000. Based on our literature review, such a system does not currently exist.
    21 KB (3,664 words) - 21:38, 4 June 2015
  • Huang, B. a. (2009). Super resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annual review of biochemistry, 993-1016.
    2 KB (233 words) - 20:37, 19 May 2011
  • * [[A.Williams:_Objectives_and_Literature_Review| Objectives & Literature Review -- Ajoke Williams]]
    927 B (112 words) - 05:02, 18 May 2012
  • [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]<br/>
    2 KB (310 words) - 03:23, 20 May 2012
  • <h2> Objectives and Literature Review </h2>
    7 KB (1,162 words) - 07:22, 14 March 2012
  • <h4> Literature Review </h4>
    10 KB (1,500 words) - 08:41, 14 March 2012
  • #REDIRECT [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]
    58 B (7 words) - 14:39, 11 March 2012
  • ...llows the consumer to refocus the image before capturing a light field, to review all past photos still on the camera, and to refocus after capturing the ima
    18 KB (2,796 words) - 05:15, 18 May 2012
  • ==Review of linear regression==
    5 KB (774 words) - 18:07, 13 January 2014
  • This bootcamp requires an understanding of basic circuits. If you need to review circuit concepts, start with the [[Electronics Primer]] page. If you have a
    35 KB (5,891 words) - 18:46, 7 April 2017
  • [[Category:Needs review]] ==Concept review==
    793 B (95 words) - 21:35, 4 June 2015
  • ...l. Fortunately, there always seems to be somebody with a bigger office who needs a couch. ==Review of probability and statists concepts==
    24 KB (3,757 words) - 14:57, 3 September 2018
  • For a good review of geometrical optics, ray tracing, and some worked-out ray tracing example
    28 KB (4,857 words) - 20:09, 31 July 2017
  • ==Regression concepts review==
    30 KB (4,815 words) - 21:47, 27 December 2015
  • ... topic). Do your best to incorporate suggestions from the peer and faculty review.
    14 KB (2,255 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...l-biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    12 KB (2,006 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...ab partner. Begin by reading the [[Media:PeerReviewTips.pdf| tips for peer review]] from Neal Lerner. Then, as you read your lab partner's writing, be a thou ...uggestions for improvement whenever possible. Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner.
    16 KB (2,751 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    7 KB (1,208 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    27 KB (3,752 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be
    10 KB (1,692 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
    11 KB (1,738 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    12 KB (1,954 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ====Review Articles (for reference only)==== ====Review Articles (for reference only)====
    9 KB (1,472 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    22 KB (3,631 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (761 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,912 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    14 KB (2,336 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
    19 KB (3,251 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    22 KB (3,724 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    4 KB (732 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,849 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>
    19 KB (3,069 words) - 15:48, 15 June 2015
  • ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on
    9 KB (1,466 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    4 KB (600 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    9 KB (1,473 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over
    17 KB (2,960 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over
    15 KB (2,609 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #Review your understanding of protein structure visualization by examining another
    21 KB (3,477 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>
    20 KB (3,237 words) - 15:45, 15 June 2015
  • # Review the descriptions of the lab's microscopes that we covered during [http://op
    9 KB (1,436 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • ...]]. You will be presenting one of these articles to the class, so begin to review both the [[20.109(S07):Guidelines for oral presentations| guidelines for or
    7 KB (1,103 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #To better understand how the library of plasmids was synthesized, please review the chemistry involved in joining nucleotides during DNA replication. Draw
    10 KB (1,637 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,850 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    22 KB (3,670 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • ...: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Help:Ribosome_Binding_Site this review site] which includes some useful characterization information. <font color ... the point of the sentence hard to get"</i>). Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner. Keep your fingers crossed tha
    19 KB (3,059 words) - 16:00, 15 June 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    4 KB (733 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • ...ext time| a homework assignment], exchanged with your lab partner for peer review, then submitted to the teaching faculty as part of your portfolio. <b>This
    15 KB (2,532 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • ...s=4&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum review's abstract and pubmed link]
    11 KB (1,596 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. Phage that can bind to cobalt oxide, gold, iridium and indium tin oxide ar ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    10 KB (1,707 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    26 KB (4,345 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    12 KB (1,972 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
    19 KB (3,254 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be
    10 KB (1,692 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on
    9 KB (1,467 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • Many phenotypes have been described for <i> S. cerevisiae</i>. A very fine review of these was published by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db ...dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9301019&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Hampsey review] to familiarize yourself with the range of phenotypes that are detectable a
    21 KB (3,401 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...ue to the religious holiday and would like to meet on Friday (10.10.08) to review the material we covered, please just email me and we can set up a time. [[U
    3 KB (565 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    16 KB (2,756 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    23 KB (3,892 words) - 19:30, 28 July 2015
  • ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
    11 KB (1,738 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. Phage that can bind to cobalt oxide, gold, iridium and indium tin oxide ar ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    10 KB (1,707 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • Many phenotypes have been described for <i> S. cerevisiae</i>. A very fine review of these was published by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db ...dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9301019&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Hampsey review] to familiarize yourself with the range of phenotypes that are detectable a
    25 KB (4,068 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    22 KB (3,807 words) - 19:29, 28 July 2015
  • ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
    11 KB (1,701 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http
    10 KB (1,701 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
    18 KB (3,152 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
  • ...csum Wu et al, published in Mol Cell in 2004]. There is also an associated review article [http://openwetware.org/wiki/PMID:_15653319 ] that was written to c
    9 KB (1,612 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,922 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (761 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (788 words) - 19:34, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    13 KB (2,033 words) - 19:34, 28 July 2015
  • ...light and dark to assess the β-gal activity associated with your mutants. Review the [[20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] tha
    17 KB (2,716 words) - 19:39, 28 July 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    13 KB (2,155 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    14 KB (2,303 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
  • ...ssion next time. You will have 45 minutes of in-class time to complete and review your reading. As before, each pair of students will present one figure or s
    22 KB (3,613 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (904 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
  • | Neal/Linda visit lab for peer review exercise<br> [[Media:20.109(F09) M1D6lab.pptx| NK lab notes]], [[Media:F09_
    9 KB (1,307 words) - 19:42, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    22 KB (3,783 words) - 19:44, 28 July 2015
  • ...should be well on your way to your final presentations of a research idea. Review the required elements for your presentation that are noted [http://openwetw
    5 KB (921 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...t 2 copies of this draft for next time. We will use them in lab for a peer review exercise. * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o
    10 KB (1,761 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...are too harsh or too obscure to be integrated into a revision. During your review, find at least one good example in the background/aims/results/plans/figure
    11 KB (1,830 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...l will be photographed. While the gel is running, we will engage in a peer review session around the preliminary results sections that you've all written as
    11 KB (1,830 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http
    10 KB (1,594 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o ... be used to detect homologous recombination in mammalian cells. The reader needs to know what the goal is: which plasmid did you set out to create? Part B o
    7 KB (1,083 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (777 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    13 KB (1,951 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (879 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    27 KB (4,508 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • Review [[20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 1 Testing an engineered biological system| protoco
    13 KB (2,115 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    16 KB (2,666 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (919 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • ...ummary statement will be due at the end of the next module so you can also review the requirements for this assignment [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109(F1
    10 KB (1,613 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o ... be used to detect homologous recombination in mammalian cells. The reader needs to know what the goal is: which plasmid did you set out to create? Part B o
    7 KB (1,131 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    27 KB (4,538 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    18 KB (2,793 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (815 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...10) M1D6 labtalk.pdf| M1D6 lab lecture]]<br> Neal/Linda visit lab for peer review exercise<br>
    8 KB (1,189 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    22 KB (3,783 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (880 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...t 2 copies of this draft for next time. We will use them in lab for a peer review exercise. * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o
    11 KB (1,791 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...are too harsh or too obscure to be integrated into a revision. During your review, find at least one good example in the background/aims/results/plans/figure
    11 KB (1,830 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...lve patient intake of heme to inhibit the defective synthetic pathway (see review [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19479318 at this link]).
    8 KB (1,243 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...s include those that regulate chemotaxis, osmoregulation, and virulence. A review of 2CS from the perspective of appropriate signal transduction &mdash; e.g.
    17 KB (2,967 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • | ? peer review exercise, or maybe lab practical on part 1<br>
    5 KB (682 words) - 21:07, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    22 KB (3,809 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • *a review of the science on which the recombination assay is based
    3 KB (528 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (879 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http ...ering Module is due in just over a week. It is strongly suggested that you review the feedback you've gotten on the figures you've prepared so far and improv
    10 KB (1,541 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • *Begin this section with a 3 sentence review/overview. *a three sentence overview/review to begin this section
    7 KB (1,159 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • ...should be well on your way to your final presentations of a research idea. Review the required elements for your presentation that are noted [http://openwetw
    5 KB (811 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • Review the [[20.109(F11): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] pre
    16 KB (2,610 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • ...ummary statement will be due at the end of the next module so you can also review the requirements for this assignment [[20.109(F11):Blogging and summary tho
    10 KB (1,644 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    18 KB (3,015 words) - 13:43, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    2 KB (345 words) - 13:43, 29 July 2015
  • #The anode needs to be coated in a layer of Surlyn (a trademarked resin from Dupont. This e ...t 300 words by midnight M3D5. Your summary statement is also almost due so review the requirements for this assignment [[20.109(F12): Reflections| here]] and
    5 KB (883 words) - 13:43, 29 July 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    13 KB (2,152 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • ...l/biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    15 KB (2,447 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • ...equencing pros after your Module 1 experience, of course, but feel free to review the relevant background [[20.109%28S13%29:DNA_sequencing_and_primer_analysi
    15 KB (2,584 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
    5 KB (674 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    27 KB (4,582 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    16 KB (2,718 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    6 KB (932 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
    8 KB (1,267 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (895 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    6 KB (923 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    22 KB (3,317 words) - 13:48, 29 July 2015
  • ...l/biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f ***RLT needs to have &beta;mercaptoethanol added before use (just an aliquot, stable for
    24 KB (4,100 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    22 KB (3,344 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th ..., and (2) some further elaboration/detail/citations for the instructors to review.
    14 KB (2,342 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20. ... induced. Think back to Agi's lecture on statistical analysis &ndash; what needs to be done to answer that question? You may find [[Media: S09_20109_M2D5-St
    14 KB (2,345 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • '''''You will complete this assignment individually.''''' Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F14):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109(F14): Assignments | ('''link''')]] as well a
    9 KB (1,410 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F14):Module
    23 KB (3,882 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • *Review the [[20.109(F14):Guidelines for working in the tissue culture facility| ti
    20 KB (3,455 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20.
    11 KB (1,850 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    29 KB (4,864 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • Review the [[20.109(F14): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] pre
    15 KB (2,449 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    16 KB (2,583 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • ...sted in more information about biotemplating, you may want to consult this review article: [http://cdn-pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cm702152a?journalCode=cm
    13 KB (2,165 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F14):Statement on collaboration and integrity | stateme Please review the scientific writing guidelines related to methods [[20.109%28F14%29:Guid
    3 KB (408 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    22 KB (3,322 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (895 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • #'''review the instructions''' for giving an oral presentation, even if you will not b # '''review Atissa's instructions''' about constructing slides and draft the slides you
    3 KB (513 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
    14 KB (2,324 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • *Begin this section with a 3 sentence review/overview. *a three sentence overview/review to begin this section
    7 KB (1,144 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • *Begin this section with a 3 sentence review/overview. *a three sentence overview/review to begin this section
    8 KB (1,258 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • #'''review the guidelines''' for giving an oral presentation that are [[20.109(F14):Gu
    2 KB (409 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20.
    14 KB (2,341 words) - 14:02, 29 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    16 KB (2,583 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    16 KB (2,577 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...to via one gene (usually 16S rRNA) alone. You can learn more in the linked review papers [http://www.microbialinformaticsj.com/content/pdf/2042-5783-2-3.pdf
    22 KB (3,588 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...ngs for the AIV screening portion of this module as a Primer Design Memo. Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28S15%29:Primer_design_memo guideli
    24 KB (3,931 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...sted in more information about biotemplating, you may want to consult this review article: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm702152a] Sotiropoulou, Sofia, et al.
    14 KB (2,281 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ===Part 2: Peer Review of Methods Homework=== ...ific comments to your fellow 109er about what they have done well and what needs further work. Complete this activity using the "golden rule" -- offer the t
    18 KB (2,885 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...ngs for the AIV screening portion of this module as a Primer Design Memo. Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28S15%29:Primer_design_memo guideli
    6 KB (992 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • #*Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28S15%29:Guidelines_for_oral_presen
    13 KB (2,073 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...sh; a process that shouldn’t be rushed. To help get you started, let’s review a few key elements of DNA repair and of the NHEJ pathway in particular. ...e schematic below from the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24680220 '''review by Grundy et al.'''] highlights that many accessory molecules have their ow
    15 KB (2,568 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    16 KB (2,579 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (894 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    21 KB (3,275 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • #*Review the [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28S15%29:Guidelines_for_writing_up_
    2 KB (235 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    25 KB (4,176 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...is described in the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15489351 '''linked review'''] by Dr. Jill Clarridge.
    15 KB (2,507 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • You will complete this assignment as individuals. Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S15):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | '''stat Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109%28S15%29:_Assignments#Overview | ('''link'''
    14 KB (2,270 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(S15):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | '''stat ...rch#Introduction | '''funnel structure for the introduction''']], and also review the [[20.109%28S15%29:Cell_preparation_for_DNA_repair_assays_%28Day4%29#Hom
    7 KB (1,103 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
    14 KB (2,323 words) - 17:15, 29 July 2015
  • ...lve patient intake of heme to inhibit the defective synthetic pathway (see review [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19479318 at this link]).
    8 KB (1,365 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    27 KB (4,554 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    13 KB (2,109 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • ...ion (through today's experiments) to be included in your research article. Review the [[20.109%28S12%29:_Protein_engineering_report | report-specific guideli
    17 KB (2,911 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    23 KB (3,809 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (893 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S12):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
    5 KB (796 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S12):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
    5 KB (776 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (905 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • ...l/biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    10 KB (1,708 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    6 KB (929 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    21 KB (3,191 words) - 17:30, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th * Read a recent review paper in an area that interests you. This approach is one of the quickest w
    14 KB (2,304 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    28 KB (4,787 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F13):Module
    21 KB (3,687 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • ...11am on the day of your next lab class. Submit this assignment to Stellar. Review the submission guidelines [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109%28F13%29:_DNA
    26 KB (4,292 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • #Review the [[20.109(F13):Guidelines for working in the tissue culture facility| ti
    17 KB (2,866 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20. #*Feel free to review [[20.109%28F13%29:_DNA_engineering_summary#Logistics | Logistics -- ''Guide
    12 KB (1,875 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (895 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme
    10 KB (1,586 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • ...sted in more information about biotemplating, you may want to consult this review article: [http://cdn-pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cm702152a?journalCode=cm ... biomaterials engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    15 KB (2,422 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    22 KB (3,319 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Please review the scientific writing guidelines related to methods [[20.109%28F13%29:Guid
    3 KB (433 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • You will complete this assignment in pairs. Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(F13):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | stateme Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109%28F13%29:_Assignments#Overview | ('''link'''
    10 KB (1,548 words) - 17:33, 29 July 2015
  • ...lve patient intake of heme to inhibit the defective synthetic pathway (see review [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19479318 at this link]).
    7 KB (1,218 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    13 KB (2,131 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • # Review today’s lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    26 KB (4,410 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    15 KB (2,419 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (788 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    20 KB (3,083 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • ...l-biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    12 KB (1,957 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (826 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    20 KB (3,142 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    26 KB (4,424 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (867 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S11):Statement_on_Collaboration_and_Integrity | stateme
    6 KB (1,012 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • *Begin this section with a short review/overview. *a short sentence overview/review to begin this section
    6 KB (919 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    6 KB (925 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    2 KB (345 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • #'''review the instructions''' for giving an oral presentation, even if you will not b # '''review Atissa's instructions''' about constructing slides and draft the slides you
    3 KB (512 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    19 KB (3,038 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F12):Module
    22 KB (3,714 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab certification that you will take next
    27 KB (4,585 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • *a review of the science on which the recombination assay is based
    6 KB (922 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • ...along. Nevertheless if you want to "get ready" for the lab certifications, review your lab notes and notebooks. Use the wiki to clarify what seems cryptic. Y
    2 KB (345 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • *Begin this section with a short review/overview. *a short sentence overview/review to begin this section
    3 KB (482 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20. ...ividually at your benches, using your notebooks as resources. You can also review the virtual labwork with the TA during this time.
    9 KB (1,495 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • ...osals. These will be presented/turned in just one week from today! You can review the requirements for the final proposals [[20.109(F12): Oral presentation o
    5 KB (769 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • Review the [[20.109(F12): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] pre
    15 KB (2,536 words) - 13:41, 29 July 2015
  • ...oridian genome in [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15590811 this linked review] by Keeling and Slamovits, or about microsporidia in general at this ''PLOS ... for probing phenotype (as described for microsporidia specifically in the review by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130667/ Garcia]. Recently,
    21 KB (3,355 words) - 13:47, 29 July 2015
  • ...to via one gene (usually 16S rRNA) alone. You can learn more in the linked review papers [http://www.microbialinformaticsj.com/content/pdf/2042-5783-2-3.pdf
    17 KB (2,771 words) - 13:47, 29 July 2015
  • ...is described in the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15489351 '''linked review'''] by Dr. Jill Clarridge.
    16 KB (2,542 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
  • ...oridian genome in [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15590811 this linked review] by Keeling and Slamovits, or about microsporidia in general at this ''PLOS ... for probing phenotype, as described for microsporidia specifically in the review by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130667/ Garcia]. Recently,
    19 KB (3,074 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
  • ...to via one gene (usually 16S rRNA) alone. You can learn more in the linked review papers [http://www.microbialinformaticsj.com/content/pdf/2042-5783-2-3.pdf
    19 KB (3,108 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
  • You will complete this assignment in pairs. Be sure to review the 20.109 [[20.109(S14):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | '''stat Be sure to review the class late policy [[20.109%28S14%29:_Assignments#Overview | ('''link'''
    14 KB (2,322 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th ..., and (2) some further elaboration/detail/citations for the instructors to review.
    6 KB (1,026 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    6 KB (917 words) - 13:58, 29 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    28 KB (4,689 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
  • ...ill store these samples for you at -80 &deg;C in case another Western blot needs to be completed. ...ung cancer. You do NOT need to make a figure this time, but you DO need to review the guiding questions in the Day 3 protocol and be ready to participate in
    16 KB (2,680 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
  • ...sh; a process that shouldn’t be rushed. To help get you started, let’s review a few key elements of DNA repair and of the NHEJ pathway in particular. ...e schematic below from the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24680220 '''review by Grundy et al.'''] highlights that many accessory molecules have their ow
    16 KB (2,686 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
  • ...l/biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    15 KB (2,507 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
  • You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(S14):Statement_on_collaboration_and_integrity | '''stat ...rch#Introduction | '''funnel structure for the introduction''']], and also review the [[20.109%28S14%29:DNA_repair_assays%28Day6%29#For_next_time | '''specif
    7 KB (1,028 words) - 13:59, 29 July 2015
  • * [[Complex Number Review|Complex number review]] * [[Complex Number Review|Complex number review]]
    8 KB (887 words) - 20:47, 16 October 2020
  • ==Probability review== This quick review of probability concepts is a work in progress.
    7 KB (1,214 words) - 21:12, 31 January 2019
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    28 KB (4,525 words) - 14:45, 12 November 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    14 KB (2,182 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
  • You will complete this assignment individually. Please review the 20.109 [[20.109(F15):Statement on collaboration and integrity | stateme Please review the scientific writing guidelines related to methods [[20.109%28F15%29:Guid
    3 KB (408 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    15 KB (2,549 words) - 00:24, 3 November 2015
  • ...r basic information on homologous recombination, please read the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [[20.109(F15):Module
    21 KB (3,638 words) - 13:47, 2 October 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    21 KB (3,266 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [[20.
    16 KB (2,572 words) - 17:58, 1 October 2015
  • *Review each of your main “messages”
    5 KB (896 words) - 11:40, 4 September 2015

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)