Search results
Create the page "Needs review" on this wiki!
Page title matches
- <h2> Objectives and Literature Review </h2>7 KB (1,162 words) - 07:22, 14 March 2012
- ==Probability review== This quick review of probability concepts is a work in progress.7 KB (1,214 words) - 21:12, 31 January 2019
-
3 KB (553 words) - 15:40, 12 August 2016
Page text matches
- ...a much higher frequency. So rip that sucker off — now your amplifier needs to work on a signal that is changing much more quickly. ...iki page]] to become familiar with the software. You may find it useful to review the block diagram again on the [[Understanding the lock-in amplifier]] wiki20 KB (3,227 words) - 20:05, 7 November 2017
- ...ntary olives. See the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|this wiki page]] for a review of the temperature-dependent equilibrium between single-stranded and double ...hermodynamics before (or if it has been a while since you have), see this review of [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics]] before you go on.10 KB (1,473 words) - 03:39, 13 April 2016
- ...a much higher frequency. So rip that sucker off — now your amplifier needs to work on a signal that is changing much more quickly. ...iki page]] to become familiar with the software. You may find it useful to review the block diagram again on the [[Understanding the lock-in amplifier]] wiki17 KB (2,813 words) - 22:56, 7 November 2017
- ==Review of electrical units and equations== ...itle=Electronics_Primer#Primary_definitions Primary definitions] and also review [http://measure.mit.edu/~20.309/wiki/index.php?title=Electronics_Primer#Con22 KB (3,534 words) - 13:50, 19 October 2018
- [[Category:Needs review]]5 KB (714 words) - 16:37, 7 February 2020
- ...perational principles of a commercial AFM. You may also find it helpful to review some of the ''[[Lab Manual: Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)#References|refere To be useful for imaging, an AFM needs to scan its probe over the sample surface. Our microscopes are designed wit56 KB (9,320 words) - 20:42, 13 December 2017
- ...Mason1997.pdf Particle Tracking Microrheology of Complex Fluids]. Physical Review Letters, Volume 79, Number 17, 27 October 1997.810 B (94 words) - 18:03, 13 August 2013
- ==Electronics Review==459 B (49 words) - 14:32, 23 August 2013
- ...e not previously studied geometric optics or those in need of a refresher. Review sessions on electronics and linear systems will also be offered. The value of a careful literature review cannot be understated. This frequently neglected step can make the differen11 KB (1,722 words) - 17:22, 6 February 2018
- *we have little electronics experience, and Jenn needs an electronics review :)4 KB (610 words) - 00:07, 3 April 2011
- * review synthesizible and unsynthesizable commands3 KB (414 words) - 16:56, 15 April 2011
- * Review particle tracking code690 B (93 words) - 02:09, 19 March 2011
- * Review particle tracking code690 B (93 words) - 02:15, 19 March 2011
- *Review the [[DNA Melting Thermodynamics|DNA Melting Thermodynamics Notes]]. *If you need a review of Matlab fundamentals, see [[Matlab:Matlab Fundamentals|Matlab Fundamental13 KB (2,026 words) - 22:46, 15 April 2018
- ... suggested experiments for approximately $20,000. Based on our literature review, such a system does not currently exist.21 KB (3,664 words) - 21:38, 4 June 2015
- Huang, B. a. (2009). Super resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annual review of biochemistry, 993-1016.2 KB (233 words) - 20:37, 19 May 2011
- * [[A.Williams:_Objectives_and_Literature_Review| Objectives & Literature Review -- Ajoke Williams]]927 B (112 words) - 05:02, 18 May 2012
- [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]<br/>2 KB (310 words) - 03:23, 20 May 2012
- <h2> Objectives and Literature Review </h2>7 KB (1,162 words) - 07:22, 14 March 2012
- <h4> Literature Review </h4>10 KB (1,500 words) - 08:41, 14 March 2012
- #REDIRECT [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]58 B (7 words) - 14:39, 11 March 2012
- ...llows the consumer to refocus the image before capturing a light field, to review all past photos still on the camera, and to refocus after capturing the ima18 KB (2,796 words) - 05:15, 18 May 2012
- ==Review of linear regression==5 KB (774 words) - 18:07, 13 January 2014
- This bootcamp requires an understanding of basic circuits. If you need to review circuit concepts, start with the [[Electronics Primer]] page. If you have a35 KB (5,891 words) - 18:46, 7 April 2017
- [[Category:Needs review]] ==Concept review==793 B (95 words) - 21:35, 4 June 2015
- ...l. Fortunately, there always seems to be somebody with a bigger office who needs a couch. ==Review of probability and statists concepts==24 KB (3,757 words) - 14:57, 3 September 2018
- For a good review of geometrical optics, ray tracing, and some worked-out ray tracing example28 KB (4,857 words) - 20:09, 31 July 2017
- ==Regression concepts review==30 KB (4,815 words) - 21:47, 27 December 2015
- ... topic). Do your best to incorporate suggestions from the peer and faculty review.14 KB (2,255 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
- ...l-biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f12 KB (2,006 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
- ...ab partner. Begin by reading the [[Media:PeerReviewTips.pdf| tips for peer review]] from Neal Lerner. Then, as you read your lab partner's writing, be a thou ...uggestions for improvement whenever possible. Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner.16 KB (2,751 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
- <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th7 KB (1,208 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
- ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o27 KB (3,752 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
- ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be10 KB (1,692 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
- ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.11 KB (1,738 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
- ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?12 KB (1,954 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
- ====Review Articles (for reference only)==== ====Review Articles (for reference only)====9 KB (1,472 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
- # Review today s lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi22 KB (3,631 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
- *Review each of your main messages5 KB (761 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
- ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w12 KB (1,912 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
- ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.14 KB (2,336 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
- ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>19 KB (3,251 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
- # Review today s lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi22 KB (3,724 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
- *Review each of your main messages4 KB (732 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
- ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w12 KB (1,849 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
- ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>19 KB (3,069 words) - 15:48, 15 June 2015
- ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on9 KB (1,466 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
- ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f4 KB (600 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
- ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f9 KB (1,473 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
- #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over17 KB (2,960 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
- #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over15 KB (2,609 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
- #Review your understanding of protein structure visualization by examining another21 KB (3,477 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
- ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>20 KB (3,237 words) - 15:45, 15 June 2015
- # Review the descriptions of the lab's microscopes that we covered during [http://op9 KB (1,436 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
- ...]]. You will be presenting one of these articles to the class, so begin to review both the [[20.109(S07):Guidelines for oral presentations| guidelines for or7 KB (1,103 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
- #To better understand how the library of plasmids was synthesized, please review the chemistry involved in joining nucleotides during DNA replication. Draw10 KB (1,637 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
- ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w12 KB (1,850 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
- # Review today s lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi22 KB (3,670 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
- ...: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Help:Ribosome_Binding_Site this review site] which includes some useful characterization information. <font color ... the point of the sentence hard to get"</i>). Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner. Keep your fingers crossed tha19 KB (3,059 words) - 16:00, 15 June 2015
- *Review each of your main messages4 KB (733 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
- ...ext time| a homework assignment], exchanged with your lab partner for peer review, then submitted to the teaching faculty as part of your portfolio. <b>This15 KB (2,532 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
- ...s=4&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum review's abstract and pubmed link]11 KB (1,596 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
- ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. Phage that can bind to cobalt oxide, gold, iridium and indium tin oxide ar ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f10 KB (1,707 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
- # Review today s lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi26 KB (4,345 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th12 KB (1,972 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>19 KB (3,254 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be10 KB (1,692 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on9 KB (1,467 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- Many phenotypes have been described for <i> S. cerevisiae</i>. A very fine review of these was published by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db ...dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9301019&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Hampsey review] to familiarize yourself with the range of phenotypes that are detectable a21 KB (3,401 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...ue to the religious holiday and would like to meet on Friday (10.10.08) to review the material we covered, please just email me and we can set up a time. [[U3 KB (565 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f16 KB (2,756 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o23 KB (3,892 words) - 19:30, 28 July 2015
- ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.11 KB (1,738 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. Phage that can bind to cobalt oxide, gold, iridium and indium tin oxide ar ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f10 KB (1,707 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- Many phenotypes have been described for <i> S. cerevisiae</i>. A very fine review of these was published by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db ...dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9301019&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Hampsey review] to familiarize yourself with the range of phenotypes that are detectable a25 KB (4,068 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o22 KB (3,807 words) - 19:29, 28 July 2015
- ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.11 KB (1,701 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http10 KB (1,701 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
- ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>18 KB (3,152 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
- ...csum Wu et al, published in Mol Cell in 2004]. There is also an associated review article [http://openwetware.org/wiki/PMID:_15653319 ] that was written to c9 KB (1,612 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
- ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w12 KB (1,922 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
- *Review each of your main messages5 KB (761 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
- *Review each of your main messages5 KB (788 words) - 19:34, 28 July 2015
- ...e way a journal s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w13 KB (2,033 words) - 19:34, 28 July 2015
- ...light and dark to assess the β-gal activity associated with your mutants. Review the [[20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] tha17 KB (2,716 words) - 19:39, 28 July 2015
- ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?13 KB (2,155 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
- ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.14 KB (2,303 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
- ...ssion next time. You will have 45 minutes of in-class time to complete and review your reading. As before, each pair of students will present one figure or s22 KB (3,613 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
- <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th5 KB (904 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
- | Neal/Linda visit lab for peer review exercise<br> [[Media:20.109(F09) M1D6lab.pptx| NK lab notes]], [[Media:F09_9 KB (1,307 words) - 19:42, 28 July 2015
- ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o22 KB (3,783 words) - 19:44, 28 July 2015
- ...should be well on your way to your final presentations of a research idea. Review the required elements for your presentation that are noted [http://openwetw5 KB (921 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
- ...t 2 copies of this draft for next time. We will use them in lab for a peer review exercise. * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o10 KB (1,761 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
- ...are too harsh or too obscure to be integrated into a revision. During your review, find at least one good example in the background/aims/results/plans/figure11 KB (1,830 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
- ...l will be photographed. While the gel is running, we will engage in a peer review session around the preliminary results sections that you've all written as11 KB (1,830 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
- ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http10 KB (1,594 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
- * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o ... be used to detect homologous recombination in mammalian cells. The reader needs to know what the goal is: which plasmid did you set out to create? Part B o7 KB (1,083 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
- *Review each of your main messages5 KB (777 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
- ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w13 KB (1,951 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
- <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th5 KB (879 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015