Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • #REDIRECT [[A.Williams: Objectives and Literature Review]]
    58 B (7 words) - 14:39, 11 March 2012
  • ...llows the consumer to refocus the image before capturing a light field, to review all past photos still on the camera, and to refocus after capturing the ima
    18 KB (2,796 words) - 05:15, 18 May 2012
  • ==Review of linear regression==
    5 KB (774 words) - 18:07, 13 January 2014
  • This bootcamp requires an understanding of basic circuits. If you need to review circuit concepts, start with the [[Electronics Primer]] page. If you have a
    35 KB (5,891 words) - 18:46, 7 April 2017
  • [[Category:Needs review]] ==Concept review==
    793 B (95 words) - 21:35, 4 June 2015
  • ...l. Fortunately, there always seems to be somebody with a bigger office who needs a couch. ==Review of probability and statists concepts==
    24 KB (3,757 words) - 14:57, 3 September 2018
  • For a good review of geometrical optics, ray tracing, and some worked-out ray tracing example
    28 KB (4,857 words) - 20:09, 31 July 2017
  • ==Regression concepts review==
    30 KB (4,815 words) - 21:47, 27 December 2015
  • ... topic). Do your best to incorporate suggestions from the peer and faculty review.
    14 KB (2,255 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...l-biomaterial engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    12 KB (2,006 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...ab partner. Begin by reading the [[Media:PeerReviewTips.pdf| tips for peer review]] from Neal Lerner. Then, as you read your lab partner's writing, be a thou ...uggestions for improvement whenever possible. Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner.
    16 KB (2,751 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    7 KB (1,208 words) - 16:04, 15 June 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    27 KB (3,752 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be
    10 KB (1,692 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
    11 KB (1,738 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    12 KB (1,954 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • ====Review Articles (for reference only)==== ====Review Articles (for reference only)====
    9 KB (1,472 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    22 KB (3,631 words) - 14:24, 5 June 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (761 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,912 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    14 KB (2,336 words) - 14:25, 5 June 2015
  • ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
    19 KB (3,251 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    22 KB (3,724 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    4 KB (732 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,849 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>
    19 KB (3,069 words) - 15:48, 15 June 2015
  • ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on
    9 KB (1,466 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    4 KB (600 words) - 15:32, 15 June 2015
  • ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    9 KB (1,473 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over
    17 KB (2,960 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #Begin by looking at the primer record you wrote last time and review your planning of the myc-tag that you designed. Do the single-stranded over
    15 KB (2,609 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #Review your understanding of protein structure visualization by examining another
    21 KB (3,477 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • ...ve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=12542690&query_hl=6&itool=pubmed_docsum the review by Vetter and LeClerc]) in FEBS 2003. <br>
    20 KB (3,237 words) - 15:45, 15 June 2015
  • # Review the descriptions of the lab's microscopes that we covered during [http://op
    9 KB (1,436 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • ...]]. You will be presenting one of these articles to the class, so begin to review both the [[20.109(S07):Guidelines for oral presentations| guidelines for or
    7 KB (1,103 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • #To better understand how the library of plasmids was synthesized, please review the chemistry involved in joining nucleotides during DNA replication. Draw
    10 KB (1,637 words) - 15:31, 15 June 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,850 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    22 KB (3,670 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • ...: [http://parts.mit.edu/registry/index.php/Help:Ribosome_Binding_Site this review site] which includes some useful characterization information. <font color ... the point of the sentence hard to get"</i>). Print out two copies of your review, one to hand in and one for your lab partner. Keep your fingers crossed tha
    19 KB (3,059 words) - 16:00, 15 June 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    4 KB (733 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • ...ext time| a homework assignment], exchanged with your lab partner for peer review, then submitted to the teaching faculty as part of your portfolio. <b>This
    15 KB (2,532 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • ...s=4&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum review's abstract and pubmed link]
    11 KB (1,596 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. Phage that can bind to cobalt oxide, gold, iridium and indium tin oxide ar ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    10 KB (1,707 words) - 15:54, 15 June 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    26 KB (4,345 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    12 KB (1,972 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
    19 KB (3,254 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...ure of biological engineering, integrity in scientific publishing and peer review, and trends and regulation in the biotechnology industry, among others. Be
    10 KB (1,692 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...rlVersion=0&_userid=501045&md5=b1c5e4e2f9e0094a16d7b6ac47413f7f associated review article] that was written to celebrate and highlight this important work on
    9 KB (1,467 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • Many phenotypes have been described for <i> S. cerevisiae</i>. A very fine review of these was published by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db ...dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9301019&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Hampsey review] to familiarize yourself with the range of phenotypes that are detectable a
    21 KB (3,401 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...ue to the religious holiday and would like to meet on Friday (10.10.08) to review the material we covered, please just email me and we can set up a time. [[U
    3 KB (565 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    16 KB (2,756 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    23 KB (3,892 words) - 19:30, 28 July 2015
  • ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
    11 KB (1,738 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. Phage that can bind to cobalt oxide, gold, iridium and indium tin oxide ar ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    10 KB (1,707 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • Many phenotypes have been described for <i> S. cerevisiae</i>. A very fine review of these was published by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db ...dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9301019&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum Hampsey review] to familiarize yourself with the range of phenotypes that are detectable a
    25 KB (4,068 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    22 KB (3,807 words) - 19:29, 28 July 2015
  • ... minutes) and the gel will be photographed. While you are waiting, you can review and discuss the assigned article.
    11 KB (1,701 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http
    10 KB (1,701 words) - 19:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...distinguish these possible explanations but it can tell you that something needs to be re-worked. ...s important work on the structure of the SAGA complex. You might find this review helpful but you are not required to read it. <br>
    18 KB (3,152 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
  • ...csum Wu et al, published in Mol Cell in 2004]. There is also an associated review article [http://openwetware.org/wiki/PMID:_15653319 ] that was written to c
    9 KB (1,612 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    12 KB (1,922 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (761 words) - 19:06, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (788 words) - 19:34, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journals editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    13 KB (2,033 words) - 19:34, 28 July 2015
  • ...light and dark to assess the β-gal activity associated with your mutants. Review the [[20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 2 Measuring system performance| protocol]] tha
    17 KB (2,716 words) - 19:39, 28 July 2015
  • ...ool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum this review by David Clapham in Cell], or [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11830654?
    13 KB (2,155 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
  • ...nable titration curves by following the example of Nagai, the introduction/review of binding constants below may help contextualize your analysis.
    14 KB (2,303 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
  • ...ssion next time. You will have 45 minutes of in-class time to complete and review your reading. As before, each pair of students will present one figure or s
    22 KB (3,613 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (904 words) - 19:33, 28 July 2015
  • | Neal/Linda visit lab for peer review exercise<br> [[Media:20.109(F09) M1D6lab.pptx| NK lab notes]], [[Media:F09_
    9 KB (1,307 words) - 19:42, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    22 KB (3,783 words) - 19:44, 28 July 2015
  • ...should be well on your way to your final presentations of a research idea. Review the required elements for your presentation that are noted [http://openwetw
    5 KB (921 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...t 2 copies of this draft for next time. We will use them in lab for a peer review exercise. * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o
    10 KB (1,761 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...are too harsh or too obscure to be integrated into a revision. During your review, find at least one good example in the background/aims/results/plans/figure
    11 KB (1,830 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...l will be photographed. While the gel is running, we will engage in a peer review session around the preliminary results sections that you've all written as
    11 KB (1,830 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...re)familiarize yourself with these mechanisms by (re)reading the excellent review by Thomas Helleday that you can find in the References section of the [http
    10 KB (1,594 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o ... be used to detect homologous recombination in mammalian cells. The reader needs to know what the goal is: which plasmid did you set out to create? Part B o
    7 KB (1,083 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (777 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant. Consequently, a w
    13 KB (1,951 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (879 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    27 KB (4,508 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • Review [[20.109(F09): Mod 2 Day 1 Testing an engineered biological system| protoco
    13 KB (2,115 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • ...earch tool for finding peptides that interact with materials to meet human needs. That M13 could interact with inorganic materials could not have been predi ... bio-material engineering. During lab next time, you and your partner will review the topics and narrow your choices, identifying one or perhaps two topics f
    16 KB (2,666 words) - 19:38, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (919 words) - 19:49, 28 July 2015
  • ...ummary statement will be due at the end of the next module so you can also review the requirements for this assignment [http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109(F1
    10 KB (1,613 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o ... be used to detect homologous recombination in mammalian cells. The reader needs to know what the goal is: which plasmid did you set out to create? Part B o
    7 KB (1,131 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • # Review todays lab to prepare for the lab practical that you and your partner wi
    27 KB (4,538 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...e way a journal’s editor decides whether to send your paper out for peer review or reject it as uninteresting and not generally relevant.
    18 KB (2,793 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • *Review each of your main messages
    5 KB (815 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...10) M1D6 labtalk.pdf| M1D6 lab lecture]]<br> Neal/Linda visit lab for peer review exercise<br>
    8 KB (1,189 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    22 KB (3,783 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (880 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...t 2 copies of this draft for next time. We will use them in lab for a peer review exercise. * Background and Significance: A concise (i.e. '''one paragraph''') review of the scientific premise that is relevant to the proposal, with emphasis o
    11 KB (1,791 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...are too harsh or too obscure to be integrated into a revision. During your review, find at least one good example in the background/aims/results/plans/figure
    11 KB (1,830 words) - 21:00, 28 July 2015
  • ...lve patient intake of heme to inhibit the defective synthetic pathway (see review [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19479318 at this link]).
    8 KB (1,243 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • ...s include those that regulate chemotaxis, osmoregulation, and virulence. A review of 2CS from the perspective of appropriate signal transduction &mdash; e.g.
    17 KB (2,967 words) - 21:05, 28 July 2015
  • | ? peer review exercise, or maybe lab practical on part 1<br>
    5 KB (682 words) - 21:07, 28 July 2015
  • ...basic information on homologous recombination, please obtain the excellent review by Thomas Helleday from the References section of the [http://openwetware.o
    22 KB (3,809 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • *a review of the science on which the recombination assay is based
    3 KB (528 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015
  • <i>As you can see from this image, taken from a review on hydrocarbon metabolism in marine bacteria, the alcanivorax species is th
    5 KB (879 words) - 21:08, 28 July 2015

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)